Page 1 of 1

SK Standard Plus = Wolf Match Target?

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:25 pm
by IPshooter
I read a post that says these two brands of ammo are equivalent. But, Keith's testing showed some velocity differences.

Is Wolf Match Target the closest match to SK Standard Plus?

TIA

Stan

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:35 pm
by TWP
My understanding is they are the same thing, same production line, different boxes.

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:52 pm
by Jordan F.
That was likely my post that you saw as I mentioned they were probably the same several days ago. From what I understand, SK standard plus, wolf MT and possibly Lapua SC are all the same. Produced in the factory, but different boxes as TWP mentioned. The headstamp on the ammunition is identical and they appear to be the exact same. It is normal that velocities will vary a bit with the different lot numbers so that would explain why you would get slightly different velocities between the two.

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:37 pm
by TerryKuz
TWP wrote:My understanding is they are the same thing, same production line, different boxes.
I agree. Just lot to lot variation.
For about the same price, the RWS Target ammo is really consistent from lot to lot.
Wolf was 135 a case a few short years ago. I can't believe that it was that cheap. I did snag a bunch of RWS at 289 last year.

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:10 am
by IPshooter
Jordan F. wrote:That was likely my post that you saw as I mentioned they were probably the same several days ago. From what I understand, SK standard plus, wolf MT and possibly Lapua SC are all the same. Produced in the factory, but different boxes as TWP mentioned. The headstamp on the ammunition is identical and they appear to be the exact same. It is normal that velocities will vary a bit with the different lot numbers so that would explain why you would get slightly different velocities between the two.
Jordan,

Can you tell me what Lapua "SC" is? Thanks.

And, my thanks to all for the replies.

Stan

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:32 am
by TB
IPshooter wrote:
Jordan F. wrote:That was likely my post that you saw as I mentioned they were probably the same several days ago. From what I understand, SK standard plus, wolf MT and possibly Lapua SC are all the same. Produced in the factory, but different boxes as TWP mentioned. The headstamp on the ammunition is identical and they appear to be the exact same. It is normal that velocities will vary a bit with the different lot numbers so that would explain why you would get slightly different velocities between the two.
Jordan,

Can you tell me what Lapua "SC" is? Thanks.

And, my thanks to all for the replies.

Stan
I think he means Lapua Super Club. They are not made anymore, replaced by SK Standard Plus. If they are the same I do not know....

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:51 am
by IPshooter
Thanks, TB.

name

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:10 pm
by Mike Taylor
Lapua SC could also be an abbreviation for Lapua Standard Club.
Jordan will have to clarify whether he meant 'Super Club' or 'Standard Club'. Not only the packaging is different between these two.

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:16 pm
by Jordan F.
I was referring to Lapua Superclub. Mike, do you happen to know what the difference is between the standard club and Superclub ammunition. I understand that the superclub comes in the individual boxes where as the standard club comes in the tin or bulk pack type containers. Always thought this was the only difference but had a hunch they could be different.

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:48 pm
by Muffo
standard club does come in bulk tin and when you add up the frice difference its not really that much

Super vs Standard

Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 3:05 am
by Mike Taylor
Jordan,
Realizing I had only anecdotal information ("Super Club is harder/hotter than Standard Club"), I went to the Lapua web-site to get the straight skinny:
http://www.vihtavuori-lapua.com/pdfs/Ri ... nition.pdf
Well, as you can see there, the velocity characteristics are identical (Super vs Standard)!
I think I remember borrowing a few rounds of Super Club from a friend and comparing them (fired from the same gun) against the Standard Club that I had. My recollection is that the Super Club was 'hotter' (harder recoil) than the Standard Club and that the Standard Club had a more greasy (oily) feel than Super Club. That was some two years ago and these days I can barely remember what I had for lunch, so my recollection might be faulty.
It is possible, of course, for two different brands of ammo to have the same velocity but different recoil 'feel' - due to (among other things) different powders being used. I have no knowledge of the manufacturing differences (if any) between Super and Standard.
So, at this point, I have no hard evidence to back up my recalled perception that Super Club is different from Standard Club.
mea culpa

SK ammo comparison

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:56 pm
by thbauer
As a follow-on to this thread, have any of you compared SK Standard Plus and Pistol Match? I shoot BE pistol using a Pardini SP at distances 50ft -> 50yd.

Thanx for your responses.

---
Ted
Baltimore, MD