Page 1 of 1

Difference between FWB-P44 and FWB-P56

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:25 am
by TimC
Aside from the obvious single shot versus 5 shot, is there much of a difference between the two models?

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:59 pm
by Richard H
Very different pistols

P56

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:30 am
by JimUK
The P56 is based on the P34, considerably modified in the breech area to accept the 5 shot magazine system. Many of the other components are interchangable.

Re: P56

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:07 am
by jipe
JimUK wrote:The P56 is based on the P34, considerably modified in the breech area to accept the 5 shot magazine system. Many of the other components are interchangable.
Indeed, the P56 derives from the problematic P55 which is derived from the old P34 that was not such a great pistol.

The P44 is a new design.

The P56 is also pretty expensive (usually more expensive than the LP50). Personnally, I do not see any reason to buy a P56: the LP50 is an excellent pistol, has the same balance/feeling as the LP10 (for those who shoot both precision and velocity), is by far the market leader and is cheaper.

RE: LP-10 / LP-50

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:04 am
by TimC
Well, since you brought it up :) What then is the difference between
the Steyr LP-10 and LP-50? If you had a LP-10, is the LP-50 the same
except it hold 5 rounds?

TimC

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:10 am
by Richard H
Biggest difference is the LP-10 has a 2-stage trigger and the LP-50 has a single stage trigger.

Here's a link to the brochure on the Steyr Web site that actually compares the two http://www.steyr-sportwaffen.at/showPDF ... t=Brochure

Re: P56

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:21 pm
by gunnery
jipe wrote: Indeed, the P56 derives from the problematic P55 which is derived from the old P34 that was not such a great pistol.
Just got a second hand p55, ..........
What are the problems?

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:12 pm
by cdf
55s have some track record for going full auto and doubling .

Chris

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:25 pm
by Richard H
or failing to feed.

So either its feeding too much or not enough

Re: P56

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:14 am
by jipe
gunnery wrote:
jipe wrote: Indeed, the P56 derives from the problematic P55 which is derived from the old P34 that was not such a great pistol.
Just got a second hand p55, ..........
What are the problems?
P55 experienced some blocking of the feeding/cocking due to failure of some internal small pieces (a spring and another other piece). Pistols having this problem must be repaired by FWB service with replacement of the broken pieces. Later FWB then redesigned these pieces and issued an upgrade kit.

I cannot say what pieces causes the problem since the pistol must be opened what cannot be done by the owner.

There are few P55 and even less P56 used compared to the LP50 that really dominate the market.

As said, at least in most European countries, the P56 is much more expensive than the LP50. This combined with the excellent reputation of the LP50 and bad reputation of the P55 makes that very few P56 are sold.

Re: P56

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:59 am
by gunnery
jipe wrote:
P55 experienced some blocking of the feeding/cocking due to failure of some internal small pieces (a spring and another other piece). Pistols having this problem must be repaired by FWB service with replacement of the broken pieces. Later FWB then redesigned these pieces and issued an upgrade kit.

I cannot say what pieces causes the problem since the pistol must be opened what cannot be done by the owner.
Ok, thanks. The pistol is cheked by the fwb crew on the "belgian open air"