match pistols
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 10:22 am
Why are match air pistols only around 500fps and not more?
Thanks for the input,Sean
Thanks for the input,Sean
A forum to talk about Olympic style shooting, rifle or pistol, 10 meters to 50 meters, and whatever is in between. Hosted by Pilkguns.com
https://ttorg.targettalk.net/~targetta/ttorg/
https://ttorg.targettalk.net/~targetta/ttorg/viewtopic.php?t=15739
Because that where they produce the best groups. Air rifle are in the 570 ish-590 ish range for the same reason.sean wrote:Why are match air pistols only around 500fps and not more?
Thanks for the input,Sean
At 10 m trajectory is flat. reloading trajectory tables really don't play into 10m AP and AR.ausdiver99 wrote:Higher velocities equate to less drop, reloading ballistics tables clearly show that but with increased velocity comes increased energy so I think recoil minimisation may also be a factor.
Cheers
Pete
Calculating recoil energy http://www.outdoorlife.com/outdoor/shoo ... 18,00.html
Good pointASA wrote:An other explanantion for this could could be a historical one:
According to an elder book on shooting of mine, published in German, airgun shooting became an olympic discipline only following WWII. The allies prohibited at that time the productions of weapons in Germany with the exception of airguns which were not allowed to exceed a certain energy - the famous 7 Joules. Germans have always been good "mechanics".. (Actually, the manufacturer name FWB relates to "Feinwerktechnik" which is "precision mechanics" in English. See the company history: http://www.feinwerkbau.de/ceasy/modules ... PageId=106).
Since german products have (and still seem to do so today) dominated this very market niche, the reason for the fps rate could be just that simple.
BTW: There is a nice wikipedia-article on airguns: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airguns
Yes, please let us know their response.ausdiver99 wrote:Mmmm I'm not sure I agree. Perhaps the 7J rule applied to air pistols 50 years ago and thus the MV ceiling, but if there is a competitive advantage to be had in having higher MV's then I'm sure the manufacturers would have cranked up their speeds by now. This is an interesting thread so I've fired off an e-mail to a couple of manufacturers to see what they have to say about this.
In Germany, energy below 7,5 Joule warrants an "F" for free of licence.ausdiver99 wrote:... 7J rule applied to air pistols 50 years ago ...
It's similar in the UK where the limit is 6ft lb (12 for air rifles) and, I believe, Canada where it is 500ft/sec.ASA wrote:In Germany, energy below 7,5 Joule warrants an "F" for free of licence.ausdiver99 wrote:... 7J rule applied to air pistols 50 years ago ...
Otherwise you would need a permit to own, buy and use an air pistol or an airgun.
Now that's a coincidence. I was running an air pistol range today with about 50 shooters. The only problem was with the only Aeron on the range. The pellets were so slow that the paper roll on the Sius Ascor targets was being torn instead of cleanly punched. This was working its way down into the rollers and causing a jam.ausdiver99 wrote:HI everyone, a response from Aeron follows.
Cheers
Pete
Hello Peter,
500 fps would be quite a lot, factory settings for muzzle velocity for most of the manufacturers is about 450fps (we have 420fps).
The reason for this speed is that, when you are shooting at 10 meters the pellet still has minimum trajectory (couple of mm) so there is no reason to have higher muzzle velocity.
Other reason is number of shots that you have available, with muzzle velocity from our 420 to about 450 fps you can get about 150 - 160 shots.
We have target paper tearing/jamming troubles from low velocity on our Sius Ascor 10m targets, Sydney, but I have not noticed any particular brand as being major culprits - we never seem to have any trouble with velocities above 350 fps.David Levene wrote:Now that's a coincidence. I was running an air pistol range today with about 50 shooters. The only problem was with the only Aeron on the range. The pellets were so slow that the paper roll on the Sius Ascor targets was being torn instead of cleanly punched. This was working its way down into the rollers and causing a jam.
When I see Aerons and Gamos (luckily none of those today) I know that I am going to have to use my "hospital" lanes.
I don't know where that Aeron guy got his info. Back in '98, when I first got my Morini 162E, I did a bit of testing on my Oehler 35P chronograph.David Levene wrote:Now that's a coincidence. I was running an air pistol range today with about 50 shooters. The only problem was with the only Aeron on the range. The pellets were so slow that the paper roll on the Sius Ascor targets was being torn instead of cleanly punched. This was working its way down into the rollers and causing a jam.ausdiver99 wrote:HI everyone, a response from Aeron follows.
Cheers
Pete
Hello Peter,
500 fps would be quite a lot, factory settings for muzzle velocity for most of the manufacturers is about 450fps (we have 420fps).
The reason for this speed is that, when you are shooting at 10 meters the pellet still has minimum trajectory (couple of mm) so there is no reason to have higher muzzle velocity.
Other reason is number of shots that you have available, with muzzle velocity from our 420 to about 450 fps you can get about 150 - 160 shots.
When I see Aerons and Gamos (luckily none of those today) I know that I am going to have to use my "hospital" lanes.
But what it could do is reduce the travel time in the barrel, reducing the effect of a poor follow-through.Fred Mannis wrote:Any significant increase in velocity would result in a decrease in shots per cylinder (less than 60?) or a larger cylinder, and likely no improvement in accuracy.