Page 1 of 1

MG1-E

Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:13 am
by Guestshooter
Is there anyone who has tried the MG1-E?
Or the other MG electronic pistols.

Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 3:58 pm
by Tycho
Have stoll not seen a MG1E. The others, you'll have to check Italy. Cesare does not have the export licenses for them yet. I'm waiting...

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:19 am
by scerir
At present time, in Italy, only one shooter (Maura Genovesi) is using it. I do not think the 'MG' is selling it already.

First Impressions

Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:14 am
by MG1E owner
Yess Sir
I got Mine last week. First impression is very good.
MG has improved on quality. I have had the earlier MG1.
This is far better in all aspects. It looks and feels like a quality product.
Trigger is as good as the famous CM162E. (blue copy)
But electronic is located forward of and integrated in the triggerguard
This gives a freely rotating and tilting grip. Same grip as earlier.
Grip is somewhat different than the CM162, but feels more right.
Felt recoil is very little, although velocity at 165 ms with regular bullets.
Will it take over for my dear CM162MI? I don’t know, yet
It has potentials!

Pic’s here: http://karlslundesport.dk/files/karlslu ... p/MG1E.jpg

Re: MG1-E

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 2:41 pm
by scerir
Guestshooter wrote: Is there anyone who has tried the MG1-E?
Or the other MG electronic pistols.
You asked that long time ago. Very very few are using the MG1-E here. (I've *heard* it is a bit 'nosy', and that it has minor mechanelectronic problems). I've seen just one FP (how it is called, MG5-E ?) working, in the hands of a supershooter. Frankly, it wasn't a good show.

Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:00 am
by Brian James
I am rehashing an old thread to see if any additional feedback is available on the MG1e.

Brian

Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:20 am
by scerir
I can't say that MG1-E are very popular now here in Italy. But I can say that it is now used by (a small number of) good shooters. In general people tell that the feeling that electronic trigger gives is strange. (The mechanism is different from the well known Morini's 162-E).
Regards,
s.