Page 3 of 3
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:29 pm
by Richard H
It's been an interesting discussion.
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:35 pm
by Eric U
The argument that track goes to zero for finals doesn't apply to shooting because in track they run exactly the same event over again. At least in rifle and pistol it would be equivalent to running a marathon for qualification and a 100m sprint for a final.
Eric U
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 5:22 pm
by peterz
Eric,
The argument still applies, but it isn't conclusive. I do see your point. And I am not suggesting that the proposed change is a good one.
pete
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:23 pm
by Richard H
Plus thats based on the assumption that they won't change qualifications too.
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:38 pm
by ruig
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 4:06 am
by Leon
Interesting to see that he used Russian ammo - which he describes as being superior to anything being made now.
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:45 am
by Dave IRL
Leon wrote:
Interesting to see that he used Russian ammo - which he describes as being superior to anything being made now.
To be fair, I think he's in the position to make that determination!