Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 2:50 pm
by Russ
just trying to be helpful :)

Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 2:51 pm
by v76
Fail indeed.

Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 2:54 pm
by toddinjax
Like i said, it's a really useful feature.

Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 2:56 pm
by Russ
Yes, there is better approach.

Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 3:28 pm
by Greg Derr
I got 20 bucks on one guy responding to this thread ten times. Any takers?

Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 4:28 pm
by toddinjax
Could we please get a response from our host as to whether we can add this function to the forum?

Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 6:25 pm
by Gerard
Greg Derr wrote:I got 20 bucks on one guy responding to this thread ten times. Any takers?
Moi? ;)

Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 8:33 pm
by djsomers
Hey I enjoy all the posts. Some of the threads are like watching a train wreck in slow motion. Who can resist watching?

Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:15 am
by RobStubbs
Russ wrote: Sorry, I can’t resist. ;)
That, my friend, is precisely the issue.

Rob.

Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 6:15 am
by Russ
I disagree with you Rob.

I see many issues here:
First issue is: when you and few others quietly and actively ignoring the fact that guided help is most effective way to help motivated athlete (not the reading of ten confusing posts from unknown sources.)

Second issue is: Any advice must be based on initial evaluation on performance, but not only on thoughts of unknowledgeable athlete.

Third issue is: you Rob become a part of the group of a few individuals who are benefited from hiding the real help.

I can continue this list.
Cost of this “trying to help” is wasted years for someone who built his performance on the ideas of questionable solution.

Rob, you are the coach, as I heard (provider of guided education). How many times from your 2486 posts at this forum, you just mention that "guided education is most effective way to achieve high competitive objectives"? I am afraid, that you not done it even once. :(
Is it not good advice? Why you and Mr.Greg Derr afraid to say it out loud?

Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 3:13 pm
by j-team
Russ wrote:I disagree with you Rob.

I see many issues here:
First issue is: when you and few others quietly and actively ignoring the fact that guided help is most effective way to help motivated athlete (not the reading of ten confusing posts from unknown sources.)

Second issue is: Any advice must be based on initial evaluation on performance, but not only on thoughts of unknowledgeable athlete.

Third issue is: you Rob become a part of the group of a few individuals who are benefited from hiding the real help.

I can continue this list.
Cost of this “trying to help” is wasted years for someone who built his performance on the ideas of questionable solution.
Ok, I'm convinced. Sign me up for the ignore option!

Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 4:10 pm
by Gerard
But think of all the hilarity you might miss!

Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 7:06 pm
by superstring
This thread is great! Image

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 3:29 am
by BobGee
toddinjax wrote:Could we please get a response from our host as to whether we can add this function to the forum?
So Scott, can we get this option implemented? I too have a couple of bods I'd like to suppress.

Client side solution for firefox

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:17 am
by shiocd
Hi guys.

Firefox users can find salvation from greasemonkey script.

1) install greasemonkey addon
2) install phpbb user hide script from http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/50036

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:28 am
by Rover
I prefer the old Saturday Night Live line:

"Bailiff, whack his pee-pee!"

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 6:15 pm
by Greg Derr
Rover: I think that is a Cheech and Chong line from one of their albums.

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 6:40 pm
by Rover
Greg, you could be right, but I'm certain that when I heard it it was uttered by a woman judge on SNL.

Seemed apropos for this and other contexts I've encountered.