NB. We're cool, man.NB wrote:That was a great ? Jack. My response was meant to be a joke . The one poster answered your ? well, as well as the last post. I actually sensed a little humor in your ? ,which triggered a (had to be fast ) joking response.
One of my goals here is to prompt good discussion. Sometimes it works. Sometime it blows up in my face. But I'm cool. Just like shooting. Trying to figure out what works. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn't....:)
I do agree that the high level shooters must not do any negative like you state. Therefore I can understand their absence here. Sad though, for the rest of us, as the rest of us are not that high level. I bet also that the elite, if still here, tire of the same old same old...
Luftshooter is also right (to paraphrase) about analysis and learning from mistakes as part of the learning process.
The learning process advances as the group sizes shrink. As one advances from hitting the hillside to hitting the X ring, the
>don't do that/do that< ratio will change a lot.
Like Yogi says "Ninety percent of this game is half-mental", that percent changes with group size.