CO2 Gun Issues

If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true

Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H

Forum rules
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
Post Reply
RT

CO2 Gun Issues

Post by RT »

I'm considering buying a used Steyr LP1 as a relatively low cost entry pistol. I'm just wondering if dealing with the CO2 is a pain compared to a compressed air gun and just using a pump. How do I get the bulk tank filled? Do I need a scale to weigh the cylinder? What does a filling setup cost? If someone could explain all of this it would be very helpfull.

RT
Guest

Post by Guest »

RT
This may be of some help.
http://www.pilkguns.com/co2.shtml
CraigE
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:57 am
Location: Bethlehem PA
Contact:

Personal experience

Post by CraigE »

While I don't use CO2 now, I found it to be very easy to manage. Simple postal scale (analog/spring variety) is more than adequate and can be bought for under $10. The initial outlay for a 5# bottle of CO2 (from beverage vendor) ran about $70. Refills (which were actuall exchange of tank) run about $6-7. If you are not traveling to distant matches, CO2 and two cylinders for the pistol will be very very satisfactory. I switched to CA and the pump so as not needing to depend on any supply at matches and not needing to cart a bulk tank along. Normal temperature ranges (i.e. acceptable for us humans) had negligible effect on point of impact. I shoot about 20,000 pellets a year and my filling costs ran about $12 for the year. From what I am given to understand, CA is often available at ranges, but CO2 is less readily available. With CA and a pump, this won't affect me. By contrast, with two cylinders for an LP1, there are nearly 300 shots available....hence no real problem either. HTH CraigE
Bruce Martindale
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 10:46 pm

Post by Bruce Martindale »

I have both and prefer CO2. Air has only one advantage while CO2 has only one disadvantage. That is temperature dependence of saturation pressure. It isnt an accuracy issue but if you are shooting in very high temperatures, the gun may not fire because the hammer cant overcome the higher cylinder pressure. In extreme cold, like leaving the gun in the car at wintertime, the gas pressure is low. Now the advantages, it goes forever on a fill while I barely make a full match on air. I used to weigh every fill and discovered that if I filled a room temperature but empty cylinder, I get approx 70% fill and never over, didnt need to weigh. If I chilled the cyl or flashed it off before filling, it would over fill and needed to be vented. I didnt do this once and it warmed up a little and the gun wouldnt fire and it was difficult to even vent it. The use rate is non linear so a 100% fill has vapor carryover and does not last any longer than a 70% fill. So I vent off low cylinders after 250 shots (Steyr LP1) and fill them later. Hey "tastes great less filling" You can leave a full air cyl in a hot car and should not do this with CO2 as they will blow the safety valve.

Any way sorrry for the long wheeze. Do not fear CO2 you will like it.
cdf
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:19 pm
Location: Ontario , Canada

Post by cdf »

Grab it ! We have a fine LP1 and a few Walthers at our club , their owners are pretty happy . The equipment needed for C02 is cheaper than a high performance hand pump or a scuba tank . It's a lot easier to find an outfit who will fill a C02 cylinder than than to convince some dive shops to fill a non diver's scuba tank.

Chris
RT

Using CO2

Post by RT »

Thanks for all the help. How about the size of the tank versus number of shots? Is a 5 or 10 lb tank sufficient? I'm not sure I want a huge tank.
crrmeyer
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Using CO2

Post by crrmeyer »

RT wrote:Thanks for all the help. How about the size of the tank versus number of shots? Is a 5 or 10 lb tank sufficient? I'm not sure I want a huge tank.
You will get a lot of shots out of a 5 lb tank - so skip the heavier 10lb one unless you get it for cheap.

Charles
User avatar
Fred Mannis
Posts: 1298
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Delaware

Re: CO2 Gun Issues

Post by Fred Mannis »

RT wrote:I'm considering buying a used Steyr LP1 as a relatively low cost entry pistol. I'm just wondering if dealing with the CO2 is a pain compared to a compressed air gun and just using a pump. How do I get the bulk tank filled? Do I need a scale to weigh the cylinder? What does a filling setup cost? If someone could explain all of this it would be very helpfull.

RT
It is easy to convert the LP1 (CO2) to LP1P (CA). I did it with mine. So if you ever decide that you prefer the logistics of CA, you can convert.

It is a great AP. SOme say even better than the LP10

Have fun!
Mark Briggs
Posts: 583
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:35 am
Location: The Frigid North - Ottawa, Canada

Post by Mark Briggs »

OK, I'll second many of the opinions here. I, too, have an LP1 running on Co2 and love it. I converted it to CA, and quite franky, was vastly disappointed. The pistol simply never grouped worth a darn when running CA. It produces fantastic groups on Co2, but try as I might I couldn't get it to make a tight test target on CA. So... I converted it back to Co2.

You'd be hard pressed to beat an LP1. Co2 has no shortcomings for anybody other than an elite international-level shooter (Co2 is getting harder to find at world cups).

Oh, there's one more benefit... The Co2 powered LP1 is significantly quieter than a CA-powered LP-10. I've owned an LP10 and my family commented negatively on its noise level as compared to the LP1 when I was shooting in our basement range. The LP1 using Co2 doesn't have as sharp a "crack"
User avatar
RobStubbs
Posts: 3183
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 1:06 pm
Location: Herts, England, UK

Post by RobStubbs »

Mark Briggs wrote: You'd be hard pressed to beat an LP1. Co2 has no shortcomings for anybody other than an elite international-level shooter (Co2 is getting harder to find at world cups).
That's not quite true. You will find it hard to shoot a CO2 gun in cold weather as the liquid CO2 doesn't then easily (quickly) turn into the gas. I have also never seen it at any comps so you'd need to make sure you had your own supply. Oh and don't let the cylinders get too hot - i.e. like leaving them in a hot car. They can spontaneously discharge their contents as the gas.

Rob.
Bill177
Moderator
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 9:32 am
Location: Upstate NY

Cold Weather

Post by Bill177 »

It is true that Co2 doesn't perform well in cold weather. But, neither do I!

Most competitions are held indoors where it is warm and of constant temperature.

Unless you are looking at a change of 20 degrees every few minutes and a general temperature below 45 degres - there is no problem.

If conditions were such as described, I'd not be shooting - I'd be in the lodge getting warm by the fireplace.
User avatar
RobStubbs
Posts: 3183
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 1:06 pm
Location: Herts, England, UK

Re: Cold Weather

Post by RobStubbs »

Bill177 wrote:It is true that Co2 doesn't perform well in cold weather. But, neither do I!

Most competitions are held indoors where it is warm and of constant temperature.

Unless you are looking at a change of 20 degrees every few minutes and a general temperature below 45 degres - there is no problem.

If conditions were such as described, I'd not be shooting - I'd be in the lodge getting warm by the fireplace.
That may be the case where you are but for example in my club range it drops down to maybe 5'C in the winter which would make the gun useless. So yep comps will almost always be in the warm, club ranges often aren't though.

Rob.
Post Reply