I can't speak for what kind of reaction you'd get at your club matches because I've never been there and I don't know who goes to your matches. But given that human beings sometimes fall prey to logical fallacies (e.g. argumentum ab auctoritate), I'd suppose that if there's an unexpected equipment fault (e.g. trigger doesn't pass control) that person would seek an external attribution.David Levene wrote:
I can only imagine what reaction we would get at our club competitions if we tried to disqualify a shooter when his pistol didn't lift a "piece of coat hanger and a full tin of pellets" home-made weight.
Most competition shooters have somewhat higher standards.
But we know the truth is exactly what Rover says it is: 500g = 500g, no matter what it looks like, how much it cost, or whether or not it's Mickey-Mousey (I like that expression, David, thanks for adding it!).
But then there's also Dr.Lee's statement that he does care how it looks. He says it's for "precision".
The problem is that we're biased against things that don't 'look' precision, or are "mickey mouse", or "home made" even though we know 500g = 500g.
And I'm not saying I'm not biased either - I am quite sure that if I went to a match in Phoenix at Rover's club and they weighed my trigger with a taped-shut tin of pellets and a coat hanger... well, I'd think that was weird. Even knowing it's "correct" still wouldn't make it "right".
Now of course to the DQ'd shooter - if it's a shiny fancy milled piece of metal that says "500g" and "Made in Germany" on it, well, nobody is going to argue with that.
However, if that same shooter is DQ'd because of something that looks like the very clever (and apparently ISSF legal, if it's 500g) device that bummer7 made, that person might want to argue with you because there's not as much visible "auctoritate" to lend credence to the "argumentum" that the trigger is just plain too light.
So it looks like what Dr.Lee needs is probably the Gehmann in the link a few comments above.