Rear aperture with diopter correction.
Moderators: pilkguns, Marcus, m1963, David Levene, Spencer
Rear aperture with diopter correction.
I am looking for feedback of experience with using a rear aperture that has internal diopter correction. Specifically:
1.) Are these ISSF legal? I assume they are, but the rules that disallow the attachment of lenses to the sight makes me wonder.
2.) My correction is -3.25 with a mild astigmatism. I realize that the internal diopter does not have an astigmatism component to it. At the same time, I can shoot in my contacts which also do not have the astigmatism correction. I am curious as to others experience with this.
3.) Any other recommendations or pluses and minus vs contacts and frames.
Thanks,
Mike
1.) Are these ISSF legal? I assume they are, but the rules that disallow the attachment of lenses to the sight makes me wonder.
2.) My correction is -3.25 with a mild astigmatism. I realize that the internal diopter does not have an astigmatism component to it. At the same time, I can shoot in my contacts which also do not have the astigmatism correction. I am curious as to others experience with this.
3.) Any other recommendations or pluses and minus vs contacts and frames.
Thanks,
Mike
Hi Mike,
magnifying diopters are NOT legal for ISSF.
I used one for ten years or so and only just managed to wean myself off it this year to become ISSF legal, with no loss of performance.
I spent several months doing testing with SCATT to see if there was any difference in aiming accuracy and (for me) there wasn't.
I originally only needed a small correction but, as I've aged, my eyes have now settled to a place where I'm lucky enough to be able to shoot without any correction.
Also, if you DO decide to get a diopter, test that it gives you the adjustment that you need before you hand over the cash. I found that I had to try (and reject) three before I found one that adjusted properly.
Regards,
Ken.
magnifying diopters are NOT legal for ISSF.
I used one for ten years or so and only just managed to wean myself off it this year to become ISSF legal, with no loss of performance.
I spent several months doing testing with SCATT to see if there was any difference in aiming accuracy and (for me) there wasn't.
I originally only needed a small correction but, as I've aged, my eyes have now settled to a place where I'm lucky enough to be able to shoot without any correction.
Also, if you DO decide to get a diopter, test that it gives you the adjustment that you need before you hand over the cash. I found that I had to try (and reject) three before I found one that adjusted properly.
Regards,
Ken.
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:19 am
- Location: New Zealand
- Contact:
Lenses
As I understand it neither is legal for ISSF you cannot have the lense attatched to the sight you need glasses or contacts to be legal. I use a frame to attach the lense to the peep this is not legal for ISSF either.
-
- Posts: 5617
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: Ruislip, UK
As I understand it - having taken my old Gehmann unit apart to clean it once...
The variable focal length is achieved by varying the distance that two lenses are separated by.
A by product of this is that you also get a degree of magnification which again varies with the distance between the two lenses.
Removing the magnification piece is also removing the variable diopter as both lenses are in that unit - leaving you with a standard iris.
Regards,
Ken.
The variable focal length is achieved by varying the distance that two lenses are separated by.
A by product of this is that you also get a degree of magnification which again varies with the distance between the two lenses.
Removing the magnification piece is also removing the variable diopter as both lenses are in that unit - leaving you with a standard iris.
Regards,
Ken.