lg 300xt

glr1 · Post by **glr1** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:51 pm

what is the difference between the universal and laminated stock,is it worth the extra money to get the laminated version

yana · Post by **yana** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:46 am

Imo, not really. Advantages of laminated are limited.
Check the walther website:
the normal wood XT is a tad shorter, 1050 vs 1090mm.
Also, that stock is stepless adjustable in length, whereas the laminated is not.
Laminated is more expensive as well.
Máybe a tad weight difference, allthough total weight of both is 4.4k.
Its more wether you like its looks I guess..
I have a laminated sporterstock, which I find, is quite easily dented and less easily repaired.

isuguncoach · Post by **isuguncoach** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:56 am

If the weight is an issue, not to worry, as the XT has weights in the forarm that can be removed or moved to get a balance point that is correct for you.

Joe

robf · Post by **robf** » Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:15 am

the different stocks do change the feel and balance of the walthers to quite some degree.

i would try before you buy if you can.

i am very happy with the feel of my anatomic over an alutec stock, however i've had to add a lot of weight... that said, when I used a 2002 in ally i could never get the weight and balance where I wanted it.

yana · Post by **yana** » Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:41 am

Joe, is the weight system you mention what they mean on the walther site with: 'individueller Schwerpunkt bzw Gewichtsverteilung' ? (individual balance etc). If yes, than my LG300 has it too.