adrianS -
I'd love to do that comparison. Genius. Can you give me a weight with sights for your rig as well as the balance point? That would really help me figure out what would work best by mimicking those stats on my current rig.
Thanks!
Search found 4 matches
- Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:37 pm
- Forum: Olympic Rifle - Air and Smallbore
- Topic: Walther KK300 Anatomic: Lightweight?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 6521
- Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:25 pm
- Forum: Olympic Rifle - Air and Smallbore
- Topic: Walther KK300 Anatomic: Lightweight?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 6521
Yea... unfortunately that would be Germany. Maybe. And like you said, it takes months of using it to figure it out sometimes. Maybe I'll just get what's available in lefty here in the States (not a ton of inventory) and learn to thrive with it. I doubt if I'm not shooting X's it will be a direct res...
- Sun Dec 22, 2013 5:41 pm
- Forum: Olympic Rifle - Air and Smallbore
- Topic: Walther KK300 Anatomic: Lightweight?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 6521
Thanks everyone! Anyone try them both out before deciding? Fortunately (or unfortunately), everyone loves the rifle, standard or lightweight. Would love a definitive answer, but it looks like people love the rifle regardless of which one they got. Is there a definitive list of who is shooting what f...
- Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:52 pm
- Forum: Olympic Rifle - Air and Smallbore
- Topic: Walther KK300 Anatomic: Lightweight?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 6521
Walther KK300 Anatomic: Lightweight?
I'm thinking of possibly upgrading my Anschutz 1907 to a KK300 Anatomic in order to do 3 position shooting. Does anyone have thoughts on the lightweight model versus the standard model? I think the difference is 5900 grams to 6240. I'm trim, but not small: 6'0" and 170lbs. For standing, will th...