Idea for new "JO Development Team"
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:59 pm
All,
I hope you all don't think I'm hogging bandwidth here, but I have an idea that I would like to run past you. If it seems worthy, I will present it formally to USA Shooting and/or the NRA, since they work in concert in many ways.
We all know about the levels of "national team" membership that currently exist, namely, National Team (NT) and National Development Team (NDT). To make one of these teams, one has to perform at a certain match and place accordingly. My understanding is that there are discretionarly spaces as well. Either way, these are the top adults and juniors in the country and are the ones who are often picked to represent us in International competitions.
To me, there seems to be somewhat of a gap between the club shooter who is serious and doing really well, to those who make the NDT (in this example). In most cases, one has to place #1 or #2 in Nationals or in the Jr. Olympics, but that's the only way. I believe many juniors classify this as a "longer term" goal. But what about now? Can we dangle that carrot in front of them to keep them in our sport, to keep them working just as hard as those who have already made NT/ND teams?
I believe the answer is YES! I believe that we need another junior layer of development & recognition, which I will call the Jr. Olympic Development Team. Here's the concept:
1. A person (jr. in this case) can make the team at any age, by application to USAS/NRA, based on performance at certain matches. PTOs come to mind. While scores are the primary determinant, the applicant should be well-rounded and should have good grades, be motivated, etc. An application fee would, in theory, offset costs.
2. The scores are established based on age (J1, J2, J3). For example, a 13 year old who fires a 1080 (3x40, this is just an example) at least three times in a specified period would be eligible to apply. A sliding scale for all of the disciplines could be established.
3. Membership on the team could bring status. Members could be afforded training opportunities at the OTC (or wherever), that non-members are not eligible to receive. They could work directly with the National Team coach, NRA Coach Trainer, NCDS members, etc. at special camps, clinics, and so on.
4. Members would have to apply each year, and would have to keep
moving upwards. Members would be published on the USAS web site, magazines, etc.
I believe such a concept could fill a gap that we currently have, and would (in concept) bring those shooters who are working hard, performing, but not yet ready for the NDT to the frontlight for further development. It could be applied to all programs, all disciplines. And most importantly, it will give shooters something else to aim for!
OK... comments? Pick me apart. :)
Thanks
Bill
I hope you all don't think I'm hogging bandwidth here, but I have an idea that I would like to run past you. If it seems worthy, I will present it formally to USA Shooting and/or the NRA, since they work in concert in many ways.
We all know about the levels of "national team" membership that currently exist, namely, National Team (NT) and National Development Team (NDT). To make one of these teams, one has to perform at a certain match and place accordingly. My understanding is that there are discretionarly spaces as well. Either way, these are the top adults and juniors in the country and are the ones who are often picked to represent us in International competitions.
To me, there seems to be somewhat of a gap between the club shooter who is serious and doing really well, to those who make the NDT (in this example). In most cases, one has to place #1 or #2 in Nationals or in the Jr. Olympics, but that's the only way. I believe many juniors classify this as a "longer term" goal. But what about now? Can we dangle that carrot in front of them to keep them in our sport, to keep them working just as hard as those who have already made NT/ND teams?
I believe the answer is YES! I believe that we need another junior layer of development & recognition, which I will call the Jr. Olympic Development Team. Here's the concept:
1. A person (jr. in this case) can make the team at any age, by application to USAS/NRA, based on performance at certain matches. PTOs come to mind. While scores are the primary determinant, the applicant should be well-rounded and should have good grades, be motivated, etc. An application fee would, in theory, offset costs.
2. The scores are established based on age (J1, J2, J3). For example, a 13 year old who fires a 1080 (3x40, this is just an example) at least three times in a specified period would be eligible to apply. A sliding scale for all of the disciplines could be established.
3. Membership on the team could bring status. Members could be afforded training opportunities at the OTC (or wherever), that non-members are not eligible to receive. They could work directly with the National Team coach, NRA Coach Trainer, NCDS members, etc. at special camps, clinics, and so on.
4. Members would have to apply each year, and would have to keep
moving upwards. Members would be published on the USAS web site, magazines, etc.
I believe such a concept could fill a gap that we currently have, and would (in concept) bring those shooters who are working hard, performing, but not yet ready for the NDT to the frontlight for further development. It could be applied to all programs, all disciplines. And most importantly, it will give shooters something else to aim for!
OK... comments? Pick me apart. :)
Thanks
Bill