Page 1 of 1
FWB 65 repair
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 9:16 pm
by Ranb
I bought a FWB M65 a while back. It appeared to be in very good condition with a slightly worn seal up front. $680 from an auction site. Last week it suddenly started shooting 196 fps instead of the usual 500 or so.
I bought a new seal kit and ring. Below is the condition of the old seals. It should shoot much better now.
Re: FWB 65 repair
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:09 am
by thirdwheel
Well done!
looks about the same crumbly mess I had some years ago when I decided to get into 10m and bought a 65, being an engineer I set my bench out to change the parts but it took three times as long as it should as I spent so much time marvelling at the engineering, it was a complete joy to look at and analyse. I service my own pcp pistols and they are very simple compared to the 65. Goodness that was expensive, but it is pleasing the service parts are still readily available, I changed my piston ring and spring but on reflection mine only really needed the rubbery bits.
Re: FWB 65 repair
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 10:54 am
by spektr
If you have a pistol you love, like this. You need to ask the question, "do I salt away 1 more rebuild worth of seals or not". I just started to buy seals for my CPM1 since it leaked, I bought 2 sets. I think the gun will outlive me now, but i can reseal it again if it doesnt......
Re: FWB 65 repair
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:02 pm
by Ranb
When I bought the pistol months ago I noticed that the little white buffer under the seal was brittle and flush with the cylinder, but I didn't know this indicated it was in poor condition. The seal in front looked good enough and I got 474 fps with a 3 fps stdev over the chronograph. I guess the buffer on the piston just crumbled all at once.
I'll be on the lookout for cheaper replacement parts in the future.
Re: FWB 65 repair
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:04 pm
by kevinweiho
Ranb wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:02 pm
When I bought the pistol months ago I noticed that the little white buffer under the seal was brittle and flush with the cylinder, but I didn't know this indicated it was in poor condition. The seal in front looked good enough and I got 474 fps with a 3 fps stdev over the chronograph. I guess the buffer on the piston just crumbled all at once.
I'll be on the lookout for cheaper replacement parts in the future.
When you see a flush white buffer on an old FWB 65/80/90, it's an indication of a rubber compound, which is also used in the piston seal as well.
They will disintegrate and crumble overtime even with no use. The newer seals are made of a synthetic material, will last a very long time.
If you have a lathe, you can churn out your own custom seals with polyurethane rods...
Re: FWB 65 repair
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:19 pm
by Ranb
I have a lathe that I make silencer parts on. I'll have to give the seal a try. Can you tell me exactly what kind of polyurethane is used? It seemed to be a hard rubber material.
I tested the pistol with a chronograph today. 497 fps with a stdev of 3 fps. Accuracy is back to what it was. My pistol was made in the 1980's and has two main springs.
Re: FWB 65 repair
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2021 3:21 am
by kevinweiho
Ranb wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 9:19 pmCan you tell me exactly what kind of polyurethane is used?
I don't know the exact polyurethane used, various forums mentioned using rods of 95 A Durometer urethane to make their seals.
Re: FWB 65 repair
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2021 4:57 am
by Gwhite
Machining polyurethane is tricky. It's used for seals because it is tough & abrasion resistant. You'll need super sharp tools. For working with rubbering things, freezing it may help.
Re: FWB 65 repair
Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2021 7:39 pm
by Ranb
One of my friends has a FWB65 that is missing he rear sight leaf spring. While I had mine apart for replacing seals, I measured my spring and made a replacement from some steel. But I forgot to measure the size of the cylinder head screw that holds it in place. I don't have ready access to my pistol at this time.
Anyone have the length and thread pitch? Thanks.