Trigger stage load and Flow...
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:51 pm
I have been working with the concept of Flow, or in the zone, with my AP and trigger stage loading.
First of all, I think Flow does exist although I find it difficult to define. I have read the work by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and find the empirical data as it relates to shooting not well defined. Most shooters think flow does exist but do not experience it as frequently as they would like. To assist with this thread I would loosely define flow as the the time in the shot process in which the shot breaks without conscience thought; it seems as if the gun shoots itself. Poor but workable framework....
So, to the discussion. My coach recommended that I reduce my first stage trigger load to about 200 grams and put about 315 grams of load on the second stage. He then recommend that I preload the second stage during the shot process and let my subconscious break the shot or shut the shot down if my "observation" of the unfolding of the shot indicated to abort. I worked with this for several days and gathered the following observations and data:
The load on the second stage seemed to be to great to overcome during some shots and the shot would not break without active thinking to do so... active mind kicked and said "dam" is this going to break? so much for the subconscious working
I increased the first stage load to 300 grams and 215 grams on the second stage. This seemed to work better as the load was more easy to overcome... flow was induced more frequently on shots. If this worked maybe more is better...so
I increased load further on the first stage to 400 grams and 115 grams on the second stage... this produced shots breaking before my hold settled and did not increase flow. It seemed that I did not have enough resolution on sensing second stage weight and lost shots.
From my testing it seems that a a preload on the second stage in which greater load exists, does not help induce flow and that this method may be a misunderstanding of proper trigger release while in the state of flow. It seems better to view trigger load as the first stage is loading the trigger and the second stage provides the final load to overcome for the shot to break and that load should be within tolerances of subconscious load fidelity and sensing. Preload of the second stage also indicates a potential breaking down of the shot release into 3 different zones and my view is that the second stage break of the shot in flow should be continuous and uninterrupted otherwise flow is interrupted.
Thoughts?
Mark
First of all, I think Flow does exist although I find it difficult to define. I have read the work by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and find the empirical data as it relates to shooting not well defined. Most shooters think flow does exist but do not experience it as frequently as they would like. To assist with this thread I would loosely define flow as the the time in the shot process in which the shot breaks without conscience thought; it seems as if the gun shoots itself. Poor but workable framework....
So, to the discussion. My coach recommended that I reduce my first stage trigger load to about 200 grams and put about 315 grams of load on the second stage. He then recommend that I preload the second stage during the shot process and let my subconscious break the shot or shut the shot down if my "observation" of the unfolding of the shot indicated to abort. I worked with this for several days and gathered the following observations and data:
The load on the second stage seemed to be to great to overcome during some shots and the shot would not break without active thinking to do so... active mind kicked and said "dam" is this going to break? so much for the subconscious working
I increased the first stage load to 300 grams and 215 grams on the second stage. This seemed to work better as the load was more easy to overcome... flow was induced more frequently on shots. If this worked maybe more is better...so
I increased load further on the first stage to 400 grams and 115 grams on the second stage... this produced shots breaking before my hold settled and did not increase flow. It seemed that I did not have enough resolution on sensing second stage weight and lost shots.
From my testing it seems that a a preload on the second stage in which greater load exists, does not help induce flow and that this method may be a misunderstanding of proper trigger release while in the state of flow. It seems better to view trigger load as the first stage is loading the trigger and the second stage provides the final load to overcome for the shot to break and that load should be within tolerances of subconscious load fidelity and sensing. Preload of the second stage also indicates a potential breaking down of the shot release into 3 different zones and my view is that the second stage break of the shot in flow should be continuous and uninterrupted otherwise flow is interrupted.
Thoughts?
Mark