Page 1 of 1

Smith and Wesson 52-2

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 1:50 pm
by bullseyeny
I have a 52-2 that I cannot get to group well off sandbags at 50ft. I have seen fellow shooters shoot one hole offhand with the same gun. I am currently using 148 HMWC with 3.3 gr 231. Reddot is on a grip mount. Any suggestions on where the issue is coming from?

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:20 pm
by Misny
Could be the bullet or maybe the powder charge. You may be using an incorrect crimp. It might be the scope, if you are using an inexpensive one. The grip mount may be loose. You might try eliminating the cartridge by trying some factory match ammo.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 4:15 pm
by plink182
Yes, try factory ammo but check your barrel for leading. I assume you meant HBWC.

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:11 am
by bullseyeny
Grip is tight. Ultradot matchdot scope. crimp seems good to mme. barrel is cleaned. Do these guns get shot out? Are they repairable if they do?

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:39 am
by plink182
Try 2.7 BE and make sure you bell the case enough that you can insert the bullet by hand without any damage to the lead or lube on the bullet.

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 4:42 pm
by Misny
It is unlikely that a pistol which shoots only lead bullets could ever be shot out. Take a good look at the barrel's crown to make sure that there is no damage. What brand of bullets are you using? What type of crimp are you using, i.e. taper or roll? What brand of brass are you using? What primers are you using? Are you seating the primers to the bottom of the pocket? I don't use 231 powder. You should shoot (pardon the pun) for a velocity of about 730-760 fps. You say that you have seen fellow shooters shoot the same gun off hand very well. Do you mean this same type of gun or your gun?

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:49 pm
by orionshooter
Misny wrote:I don't use 231 powder.
Misny what is it about 231 powder you don't like?

Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 4:19 pm
by PASA008
2.7 gr. Bullseye behind a 148 gr. HBWC (Star, or Hornady), with Fed primers and "taper crimped" no more than .003 I shot this load for years and it would shoot X ring.

Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:57 am
by Misny
orionshooter wrote:
Misny wrote:I don't use 231 powder.
Misny what is it about 231 powder you don't like?
I have nothing against that powder. I was just stating the fact that I don't use it, so I can't comment on his load.

52

Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:22 am
by PFribley
You might try swagged wadd cutters instead of cast. Some say the cast foul the throat too fast.

Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:47 pm
by 1911nut
I've had good results with my 52-2 using 3.1g 231, 2.8g Bullseye or 2.8g VV N310.

Some say the amount and type of crimp is important to accuracy in the 52. I use a taper crimp but other's that know more than I do say a slight roll crimp is superior.

Then there's bullets, so many choices. I shoot cast wadcutters but have been advised that Remington HBWC's are very good.

There's a good read on the 52 and reloading for it in Gil Hebard's Pistol Shooters Treasury.

I also find the Foul Out electronic cleaner excellent for removing lead in my wadguns. I can get my 45 and 38 barrels perfectly clean in 10 minutes without all that brushing.

Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 3:21 pm
by Rover
Your saying others are shooting one hole groups with the same gun should tell you where the problem lies.

I've had excellent results in mine with swaged HWBC's (Speer) and 3.2 gr. 700X.

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:06 pm
by TonyT
2.8 gr. Bullseye and 3.3 gr. W-231 perforemd equallt well in my S&W52. I would suggest that it is the hold on the sandbags which is the issue.