Steyr LP2 Velocity
Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H
Steyr LP2 Velocity
Does anyone know what the factory velocity setting is for the Steyr LP2? I have found data for the LP10, but cannot find data for the LP2. Thanks.
Ghostrip,
Thanks for the information. I know that the factory setting for the LP10 is 155 to 160 ms, but was unsure of the setting for the LP2. The reason I ask is that my LP2 velocity averages 143 ms. I didn't want to increase the velocity until I knew for sure what the factory setting actually is.
Thanks for the information. I know that the factory setting for the LP10 is 155 to 160 ms, but was unsure of the setting for the LP2. The reason I ask is that my LP2 velocity averages 143 ms. I didn't want to increase the velocity until I knew for sure what the factory setting actually is.
You could always increase it and re-test...JohnnyB wrote:I put it in a vise and shot a 10 shot group at 10 meters that went into a ragged hole. Much, much better than I can hold for certain. I think that I will leave well enough alone and keep the present velocity setting.
I'd be suprised if the LP2 was to be set any different than the LP10 - they'll be using the same barrels.
Rob.
How on earth is optimising the velocity going to mess anything up ??? And what is ragged hole size ? - 5mm, 6, 10???ghostrip wrote:with his current settings (velocity adjustment, barrel length, pellet weight etc) the gun gets a ragged hole size groups from vise. so why mess up with a successful setup?
For those who don't understand, the process is to shoot n shots, record the shot spread and the velocities and then adjust and repeat. You then return to whatever setting gave you the optimum result (smallest group size) - simples !
Rob.
for me a decent group is the one that every pellet hits the inner ten ring.
let me rephrase the "ragged" hole. if the groups with its current setup produces are x-ring why mess up a setup like this? i could understand a bit more testing if we were talking about rifles but for pistol the inner ten ring is bigger than the pellet.
let me rephrase the "ragged" hole. if the groups with its current setup produces are x-ring why mess up a setup like this? i could understand a bit more testing if we were talking about rifles but for pistol the inner ten ring is bigger than the pellet.
It's not difficult to get a one pellet (or a bit larger) hole with 5 shots.
Shoot a group with 25 or 30 shots for a more realistic picture. I have not seen ANY gun that will shoot pellet size groups that way. A good gun should be able to shoot a 30 shot group that has every shot cutting deeply into the inner ten, but the group will be larger than the inner ten.
If you have better groups with a 30 shot pellet count, I would LOVE to see them.
Shoot a group with 25 or 30 shots for a more realistic picture. I have not seen ANY gun that will shoot pellet size groups that way. A good gun should be able to shoot a 30 shot group that has every shot cutting deeply into the inner ten, but the group will be larger than the inner ten.
If you have better groups with a 30 shot pellet count, I would LOVE to see them.
I have far more productive things to do with my shooting time. To each their own though, people get enjoyment out of different things.
And my was reply to the fact the "every pellet should touch the inner ring" that would make a group that is :
5 mm (inner 10 dia)
2x4.5 (pellet dia)
.1-.2mm line width
14.1 mm to 14.2 mm. That sir is a shitty group no matter how many shots you shoot at it.
And my was reply to the fact the "every pellet should touch the inner ring" that would make a group that is :
5 mm (inner 10 dia)
2x4.5 (pellet dia)
.1-.2mm line width
14.1 mm to 14.2 mm. That sir is a shitty group no matter how many shots you shoot at it.
- chuckjordan
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:00 pm
- Location: Central Virginia
Factory settings versus your optimal settings
I have an LP2 and did exactly what the other poster said; place the LP2 in a vise (technically, I sandwiched it between two 1x2 strips.).
I found that the factory velocity (circa 575 fps w/RWS 7.0, Hobby) didn't produce the best groups. Sorry, I don't have the paper that I shot the groups into.
Long story short I found that 492 fps w/RWS R-10 7.0/4.50 produced the best groups (~ .187?). Also tested were:
JSB Yellow (486fps/4.50/~ .196?),
H&N Finale Match (4.48,8.2,487fps,~ .197),
JSB Green (491fps,4.49,~ .197),
Hobby (492,~.200?)
There are many variable involved and my testing wasn't scientific. It was me testing for my LP2.
Some may argue that a faster VO will have less dwell time (in the barrel). But now, I have the confidence where I need it (in my head) on what I can shoot to.
Your results maybe different, but, your confidence and always use the boost.
Chuck
I found that the factory velocity (circa 575 fps w/RWS 7.0, Hobby) didn't produce the best groups. Sorry, I don't have the paper that I shot the groups into.
Long story short I found that 492 fps w/RWS R-10 7.0/4.50 produced the best groups (~ .187?). Also tested were:
JSB Yellow (486fps/4.50/~ .196?),
H&N Finale Match (4.48,8.2,487fps,~ .197),
JSB Green (491fps,4.49,~ .197),
Hobby (492,~.200?)
There are many variable involved and my testing wasn't scientific. It was me testing for my LP2.
Some may argue that a faster VO will have less dwell time (in the barrel). But now, I have the confidence where I need it (in my head) on what I can shoot to.
Your results maybe different, but, your confidence and always use the boost.
Chuck
All those velocities sound kind of "hot" to me. Back off the screw until you're getting around 525 (or somewhere near that) with the lightweight pellets and 470+ with the heavies. See what the groups look like.
In my personal testing I found the higher velocities didn't hurt a thing; just used more air, increased jump, and cut cleaner holes in crappy targets. The RWS Basics made "match grade" groups at the lower setting, though.
Low or high; it won't matter much. Just play with it and have fun.
In my personal testing I found the higher velocities didn't hurt a thing; just used more air, increased jump, and cut cleaner holes in crappy targets. The RWS Basics made "match grade" groups at the lower setting, though.
Low or high; it won't matter much. Just play with it and have fun.
- chuckjordan
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:00 pm
- Location: Central Virginia