Page 2 of 2

Re: Light conditions

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2014 1:21 am
by Spencer
Ed Hall wrote:
Spencer wrote:
Ed Hall wrote:... there is at least one entity in the US that currently** disallows any "light gathering device," which means fiber optics, for one of their disciplines. For those "inquiring minds," this is for the Distinguished Pistol Program governed by the Civilian Marksmanship Program.
...
And the relationship to ISSF is ?
None! I added it because it showed an official shooting entity that supported rmca's position.
And the relationship to ISSF is ?

Re: Light conditions

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2014 2:20 am
by David Levene
therider wrote:....despite the typo error (distance 1m) in the English version....
That has been corrected in the 3rd Printing.

Re: Light conditions

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2014 5:58 pm
by therider
Thanks David.

Re: Light conditions

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 6:28 am
by Ulrich Eichstädt
flolo wrote:I never understood why the DSB is here different from the ISSF.
I would be happy if the DSB would not follow every ISSF rule. 99,6 percent of the german shooters will never appear in an international finale, but they had nevertheless to reduce the size of their blends at their shooting glasses (max 30mm on not aiming eye), so that the "many camera teams" can see their faces better.

In general it is of course better to have the same rules international and national.

Re: Light conditions

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 8:24 am
by therider
Ulrich Eichstädt wrote: ...to reduce the size of their blends at their shooting glasses (max 30mm on not aiming eye), so that the "many camera teams" can see their faces better.
I didn't know that is the reason! Good that I learned to shoot without a blend, my whole face will be on display! :-)

Re: Light conditions

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 2:21 am
by colfirth
Thanks for sharing .