I might be the only one, but watching the snowboard cross in this Olympics is making me think that it is exactly what the IOC and ISSF want shooting to become.
- It makes for good TV
- "Somebody's going to win"
- Final results are equally dependent on luck, small sample size, and skill
One key difference, of course, is that Snowboard Cross is an X-Games event brought to the Olympics, rather than an Olympic event manipulated beyond recognition in order to appeal to an X-Games crowd.
Snowboard Cross
Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H
- john bickar
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:58 am
- Location: Corner of Walk & Don't Walk
Re: Snowboard Cross
Change "manipulated" to "mutilated" and I'll buy it.
Re: Snowboard Cross
But there are inspirations too:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/16/spor ... per-g.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/16/spor ... per-g.html
- SlartyBartFast
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:04 am
- Location: Montreal, Québec, Canada
Re: Snowboard Cross
Playing devil's advocate:
Are we insinuating that "once an Olympic Event, always an Olympic event"?
Which dropped sports should be reinstated under this philosophy, how many events should there be in the games, and how many athletes?
And seeing as someone has to pay for everything, how does the Olympics pay for it all if no one watches and changing events to appeal to the X-Games crowd is unacceptable?
Are we insinuating that "once an Olympic Event, always an Olympic event"?
Which dropped sports should be reinstated under this philosophy, how many events should there be in the games, and how many athletes?
And seeing as someone has to pay for everything, how does the Olympics pay for it all if no one watches and changing events to appeal to the X-Games crowd is unacceptable?
- Smith & Wesson SW22 Victory
- FAS SP607
- FAS SP607