Does a stablilizer / absorber remove feedback? I thought it would help show more feedback by removing the recoil. Recoil would remove feedback because you can't really see what exactly happened to the sights.v76 wrote:The lack of feedback will definitely mask your mistakes, making them more difficult to analyze & pinpoint and thus, more difficult to rectify.pgmlml wrote: But I expect that a gun with a stabilizer to "mask" some of my errors... resulting in better scores!
Advice on Walther LP400
Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H
Forum rules
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
Re: Advice on Walther LP400
-
David Levene
- Posts: 5617
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: Ruislip, UK
Re: Advice on Walther LP400
There have always been guns that are more forgiving of mistakes than others.poogi wrote:If this statement is true, then it means that you can indeed buy points.David Levene wrote:No matter how good the gun is, it can only REDUCE the effect of the mistakes, and then only by a limited amount.
That's one of the reasons why, in the '80s, so many people moved to the FAS602 (in my case from the GSP). Overnight, badly performed shots went from being 7s to 8s.
There's no substitute for good technique. If you fire a good shot with any reasonable gun then it will be a ten. The difference between guns is what happens when you fire a bad shot, and how easy it is to consistently fire good ones.
If that wasn't true then we would all still be using FWB65s.