Best Starter 22
Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, Isabel1130
Best Starter 22
I have a freind who can't afford the high end 22's and wants a starter firearm. He is looking at the Buckmark and mentioned the Walther SP22. I hear Ruger also. What is recommended?
Thank you
Thank you
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:14 pm
I like rugers personally because they always function. I am currently using a ruger MKIII Target Competition model. They have excellent triggers for coming from factory. Most rugers shot cheap ammo quite well. Mine groups CCI Blazer and CCI Std Vel about 1.1inches at 50yds which is pretty much X-ring.
MKIII with VQ grip and trigger. Honestly, the VQ trigger isn't that great. But it's a cheap rig.Axehandle wrote:There are better 22 pistols and there are cheaper 22 pistols but the bottom line is you can't beat the Ruger for what you get. Just add a Volquartsen trigger and the Volquartsen grip and they are ready for me.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:48 pm
- Location: Clarksville, TN
Just because I like a Russian gun doesn't mean I'm a Red...
...but I hear and see good things being done with the IZH-35M. I've seen them go for a bit less than recent production MKII and MKIII pistols with the trick Volq parts installed.
I've been through three Rugers over the years and have to agree that they are a good place to start. There is also a significant aftermarket but this is a pistol which demands an aftermarket. True, you can start with a basic pistol in the $300-450 range and then upgrade, but wouldn't it be nice not to have to add $150 worth of parts (and that's before grips) to get what the "other guy" has?
I shoot a Marvel conversion on my 1911 (sold 2 Rugers to get it) and have been very happy with it. Consider that as an option as well. I shot my first season of bullseye with only one gun. I had a scope mount which attached to the grip panel and would change slides between 22 and CF/45. The I would remove the grip scope mount for the EIC match. Not optimal, but cheap and it worked.
I've been through three Rugers over the years and have to agree that they are a good place to start. There is also a significant aftermarket but this is a pistol which demands an aftermarket. True, you can start with a basic pistol in the $300-450 range and then upgrade, but wouldn't it be nice not to have to add $150 worth of parts (and that's before grips) to get what the "other guy" has?
I shoot a Marvel conversion on my 1911 (sold 2 Rugers to get it) and have been very happy with it. Consider that as an option as well. I shot my first season of bullseye with only one gun. I had a scope mount which attached to the grip panel and would change slides between 22 and CF/45. The I would remove the grip scope mount for the EIC match. Not optimal, but cheap and it worked.
-
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:19 pm
- Location: Wyoming
"...but I hear and see good things being done with the IZH-35M. I've seen them go for a bit less than recent production MKII and MKIII pistols with the trick Volq parts installed."
Last I heard, the IZH's were not in current production and are EXTREMELY hard to get replacement parts for. If that situation changes, I would agree, but for now, I believe the Ruger is a far superior choice.
Last I heard, the IZH's were not in current production and are EXTREMELY hard to get replacement parts for. If that situation changes, I would agree, but for now, I believe the Ruger is a far superior choice.