Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H
Forum rules
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
Are their any rules about attaching weight to an air pistol? For example, can you attach weight using double-back tape? I could not find anything in the rule book, but I seem to recall somebody saying that anything added had to be permanently attached. Thanks.
Re: Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
Fitted at gun check, don't exceed max wt and fit in the box.
Re: Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
And 8.4.1.6 Movement or Oscillation Reduction Systems. Any device, mechanism or system that actively reduces, slows or minimizes pistol oscillations or movements before the shot is released is prohibited.David M wrote:Fitted at gun check, don't exceed max wt and fit in the box.
But yes, how you mount it is up to you.
Re: Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
What about weivght that attaches to a rod that you can rotate or move, such as those use by MG or SAM? I even saw shooters will Steyr instal those kind of weights. They will not fit the box, unless perhaps they rotate the rods inward.
-
- Posts: 5617
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: Ruislip, UK
Re: Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
If they fit in the box in the position used then they are OK: if they don't then they aren't.conradin wrote:What about weivght that attaches to a rod that you can rotate or move, such as those use by MG or SAM? I even saw shooters will Steyr instal those kind of weights. They will not fit the box, unless perhaps they rotate the rods inward.
Re: Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
So if I rotate the weight rods inward so that it pass the shoe box test, I am not allowed to rotate it outward to the desire position knowing that with that position it will not fit the shoe box?David Levene wrote:If they fit in the box in the position used then they are OK: if they don't then they aren't.conradin wrote:What about weivght that attaches to a rod that you can rotate or move, such as those use by MG or SAM? I even saw shooters will Steyr instal those kind of weights. They will not fit the box, unless perhaps they rotate the rods inward.
-
- Posts: 5617
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: Ruislip, UK
Re: Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
If you tried that then I'm pretty sure you would get chosen for a "targetted" post-competition check, or interupted during the match.conradin wrote:So if I rotate the weight rods inward so that it pass the shoe box test, I am not allowed to rotate it outward to the desire position knowing that with that position it will not fit the shoe box?David Levene wrote:If they fit in the box in the position used then they are OK: if they don't then they aren't.conradin wrote:What about weivght that attaches to a rod that you can rotate or move, such as those use by MG or SAM? I even saw shooters will Steyr instal those kind of weights. They will not fit the box, unless perhaps they rotate the rods inward.
Rule 6.7.9.5 "Target Testing (selection of athletes on a non-random basis) may be done when a Jury has credible evidence that an athlete has altered or attempted to alter his gun, clothing or equipment."
Rule 6.8.5 "Jury Members have the right to examine the guns, equipment, positions, etc., of the athletes at any time, during training and competitions."
Re: Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
Does the notation 'DSQ' mean anything?conradin wrote:So if I rotate the weight rods inward so that it pass the shoe box test, I am not allowed to rotate it outward to the desire position knowing that with that position it will not fit the shoe box?David Levene wrote:If they fit in the box in the position used then they are OK: if they don't then they aren't.conradin wrote:What about weivght that attaches to a rod that you can rotate or move, such as those use by MG or SAM? I even saw shooters will Steyr instal those kind of weights. They will not fit the box, unless perhaps they rotate the rods inward.
Re: Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
"DSQ" - dumb shooting question ?
-
- Posts: 5617
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: Ruislip, UK
Re: Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
;-)David M wrote:"DSQ" - dumb shooting question ?
- John Marchant
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 4:35 pm
- Location: Bedfordshire, England
- Contact:
Re: Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
Think that says it all.David Levene wrote:;-)David M wrote:"DSQ" - dumb shooting question ?
Follow me on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/TenringsCoaching/
Re: Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
Spencer, in this particular instance the ISSF is referring to "active" systems (i.e. Miniature, spinning gyro), hich would work wonderfully well. Weights would AFAIK be classified as passive, or inactive, devices but would have to fit in "the box" as intended to be used.Spencer wrote:And 8.4.1.6 Movement or Oscillation Reduction Systems. Any device, mechanism or system that actively reduces, slows or minimizes pistol oscillations or movements before the shot is released is prohibited.David M wrote:Fitted at gun check, don't exceed max wt and fit in the box.
But yes, how you mount it is up to you.
Re: Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
I think the ISSF is referring to dynamic vibration absorbers or tuned mass dampers more than gyros, so really they're passive systems.
-
- Posts: 5617
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: Ruislip, UK
Re: Rules for Attaching Weight to an Air Pistol
Passive systems are allowed. It's active systems like gyros that are banned.JamesH wrote:I think the ISSF is referring to dynamic vibration absorbers or tuned mass dampers more than gyros, so really they're passive systems.
I get the impression that the rule was introduced proactively, before the widespread introduction of such active systems.