Height for bullseye

A place to discuss non-discipline specific items, such as mental training, ammo needs, and issues regarding ISSF, USAS, and NRA

If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true

Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H

Post Reply
Packard
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 4:40 pm
Location: United States

Height for bullseye

Post by Packard »

I just built the back stop for my 10 meter pistol basement range. It is adjustable in height in 2" increments.

I currently have it set for the bulls eye to be at my eye level. But if there is a specified standard I would rather set it to that height.

Does anyone know the specs?

Thanks.


Packard
David Levene
Posts: 5617
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Ruislip, UK

Post by David Levene »

The centre of the target should be 1.4m (+/- 50mm) above the level of the firing point.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Thanks for the answer.

OK. I have it too high. It should be 4' 7".

Where do I go to see all these regulations so that I don't have to keep asking here?
David Levene
Posts: 5617
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Ruislip, UK

Post by David Levene »

It's available as a 7.7Mb PDF or a 7.12Mb ZIP.

Most of the target, range, 10m & 50m rules are in section 6 although you should also look at section 7 for other rifle rules and section 8 for other pistol rules.
hill987
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:51 pm
Location: Kentucky

Post by hill987 »

it's 55 in.
hill987
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:51 pm
Location: Kentucky

height

Post by hill987 »

it's 55 in.
hill987
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:51 pm
Location: Kentucky

height

Post by hill987 »

it's 55 in.
Packard
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 4:40 pm
Location: United States

Re: height

Post by Packard »

hill987 wrote:it's 55 in.
I calculated (roughly) 4.7 feet. I should have written 4.7, but I wrote 4' 7".

I've had it at the right height all along.

(No need to repeat yourself, however.)
David Levene
Posts: 5617
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Ruislip, UK

Re: height

Post by David Levene »

Packard wrote:
hill987 wrote:it's 55 in.
I calculated (roughly) 4.7 feet. I should have written 4.7, but I wrote 4' 7".
You were actually correct at 4'7" (within an eighth of an inch) which is 55".

I can't see why hill987 was (seemingly) correcting you.
Guest

Post by Guest »

It's actually 1.4m (1400mm) - don't convert! - use metric
Spencer
Posts: 1889
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 9:13 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by Spencer »

have a Canadian smuggle a metric tape measure over the border?
Post Reply