Opinions of Russian Expatriates?
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:03 am
OK, first off, not trying to start any flame wars here, just curious about opinions from folks who may be more knowledgeable than I am.
I haven't shot at the same competitive level that some of you have, but I have competed in various NRA programs over the years, some IHMSA, some local Club matches, and some USBR rimfire matches. I have owned three different M54 Anschutz's (2 prone, 1 free rifle), one of the original hand-graded Suhl 150's that I still regret selling, a Walther KKM and a few other stray target grade rimfires during those years. Recently, partly through Mac Tilton's influences, I have discovered and begun collecting and shooting vintage Russian target rifles. To date I have a mint Tula MU-12 made in the mid-fifties with the DST, a Ural top-of-the-line from the same period with a bedded steel block and a free-floating action and barrel with DST, also in mint condition, and three Vostok CM-2's, one that I had to do a major reclamation project on to build a silhouette rifle for my wife, and both a 2nd and a 3rd generation that are in VG to Exc condition with all the accessories.
Before disposing of some of my other high-end rifles I had the opportunity to shoot these guns side-by-side with my Tula, my Ural and one of my Vostok's. I have also shot in competition against Anschutz's, Suhl's, Walther's, Remington 40X's and 540X's, Winchester M52's, BSA Martini International match guns, etc. So far the only two guns that would actually "outshoot" my guns (same shooters testing both guns) were the Suhl, which was one of the graded "grade 10" guns, and an Anschutz M54 (don't know the model number) that had been re-barreled with a custom BR barrel, fitted with a harmonic barrel tuner, and pillar-bedded in a McMillan glass stock. I have not shot against any of the dedicated custom BR actions and barrels like the Stolle, the Swindlehurst or the Panda, but assume that a custom-built instrument like this would probably beat my guns.
I usually make my home at www.rimfireshooting.com, but have also been known to frequent RFC as well, and many of our members take part in NRA 3P matches, Club matches, organized and sanctioned BR matches, NRA Silhouette, etc. We are starting to see more of an acceptance level for the Russian guns, particularly the commercial Izhmash CM-2, especially since the NRA just recognized it's junior or Cadet model as a Club gun. We have even seen a few of the higher-end Russians, the Ural 5-1's and 6-1's that have made their way down here from Canada and have been re-worked as BR rifles with very good success. I personally briefly had my hands on a 6-1 that had been smithed by Butch Hongisto out of the St. Louis area, had a McMillan glass stock and a Time barrel tuner with the trigger pull at an even 2 ounces. The owner of this rifle set several match records with it before it moved on. We have also seen pictures of a vintage MU-12 in Canada that was completely re-built in a custom aluminum "spacegun" stock by a master craftsman and holds most of the local club records.
So, after all of this rambling, what is the general consensus of the better Russian target rifles? You have to admit, they did well with them in 1956, 1960 and 1964, even though I think they are probably all using Annie's now. Can a shooter who dedicates himself (or herself) to learning and using one of these guns, even with their peculiarities, be competitive in MOST venues. I doubt that they would still be competitive at the highest level (although I would love to try that aluminum-stocked MU-12 in Canada ;-)), but are they "good enough" for the beginning, average, or even slightly above-average competition shooters out there? Both Mac and Thad Scott have these guns available at very competitive prices, especially Mac, who also personally checks out every gun that he sells and tries to match your needs and requirements. Both of my guns from Mac were less than $500 with all the sights and accessories, and my two personal CM-2's were bought locally for $250 apiece and the dealer let me sort through 16 of them to pick the two that I bought. This represents great value in my humble and probably unqualified opinion. I would like your opinions.
Bill McHenry
"The Highlander"
I haven't shot at the same competitive level that some of you have, but I have competed in various NRA programs over the years, some IHMSA, some local Club matches, and some USBR rimfire matches. I have owned three different M54 Anschutz's (2 prone, 1 free rifle), one of the original hand-graded Suhl 150's that I still regret selling, a Walther KKM and a few other stray target grade rimfires during those years. Recently, partly through Mac Tilton's influences, I have discovered and begun collecting and shooting vintage Russian target rifles. To date I have a mint Tula MU-12 made in the mid-fifties with the DST, a Ural top-of-the-line from the same period with a bedded steel block and a free-floating action and barrel with DST, also in mint condition, and three Vostok CM-2's, one that I had to do a major reclamation project on to build a silhouette rifle for my wife, and both a 2nd and a 3rd generation that are in VG to Exc condition with all the accessories.
Before disposing of some of my other high-end rifles I had the opportunity to shoot these guns side-by-side with my Tula, my Ural and one of my Vostok's. I have also shot in competition against Anschutz's, Suhl's, Walther's, Remington 40X's and 540X's, Winchester M52's, BSA Martini International match guns, etc. So far the only two guns that would actually "outshoot" my guns (same shooters testing both guns) were the Suhl, which was one of the graded "grade 10" guns, and an Anschutz M54 (don't know the model number) that had been re-barreled with a custom BR barrel, fitted with a harmonic barrel tuner, and pillar-bedded in a McMillan glass stock. I have not shot against any of the dedicated custom BR actions and barrels like the Stolle, the Swindlehurst or the Panda, but assume that a custom-built instrument like this would probably beat my guns.
I usually make my home at www.rimfireshooting.com, but have also been known to frequent RFC as well, and many of our members take part in NRA 3P matches, Club matches, organized and sanctioned BR matches, NRA Silhouette, etc. We are starting to see more of an acceptance level for the Russian guns, particularly the commercial Izhmash CM-2, especially since the NRA just recognized it's junior or Cadet model as a Club gun. We have even seen a few of the higher-end Russians, the Ural 5-1's and 6-1's that have made their way down here from Canada and have been re-worked as BR rifles with very good success. I personally briefly had my hands on a 6-1 that had been smithed by Butch Hongisto out of the St. Louis area, had a McMillan glass stock and a Time barrel tuner with the trigger pull at an even 2 ounces. The owner of this rifle set several match records with it before it moved on. We have also seen pictures of a vintage MU-12 in Canada that was completely re-built in a custom aluminum "spacegun" stock by a master craftsman and holds most of the local club records.
So, after all of this rambling, what is the general consensus of the better Russian target rifles? You have to admit, they did well with them in 1956, 1960 and 1964, even though I think they are probably all using Annie's now. Can a shooter who dedicates himself (or herself) to learning and using one of these guns, even with their peculiarities, be competitive in MOST venues. I doubt that they would still be competitive at the highest level (although I would love to try that aluminum-stocked MU-12 in Canada ;-)), but are they "good enough" for the beginning, average, or even slightly above-average competition shooters out there? Both Mac and Thad Scott have these guns available at very competitive prices, especially Mac, who also personally checks out every gun that he sells and tries to match your needs and requirements. Both of my guns from Mac were less than $500 with all the sights and accessories, and my two personal CM-2's were bought locally for $250 apiece and the dealer let me sort through 16 of them to pick the two that I bought. This represents great value in my humble and probably unqualified opinion. I would like your opinions.
Bill McHenry
"The Highlander"
