Torque settings (again!)
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:23 pm
The question of torque settings troubles me. The barrel vibrations (aka harmonics) are changed because the torque setting of the action mounting screws (aka king screws) alters the compression of the bedding between action and stock. This alters the stiffness of the mechanical coupling between action and stock.
Barrel and stock act as separate masses, coupled together by a variable and 'lossy' spring (the bedding). How vibrations pass from one mass to the other depends on the nature of the intervening coupling. If vibrations pass into a well-damped medium, they will die out quickly. If the junction is such that vibrations pass poorly, energy will be reflected back, causing the barrel vibrations to persist, and perhaps excite resonances (the so-called harmonics). Wood is, to some extent, a lossy medium, which damps vibrations; most metals 'ring' if excited. This is why loudspeaker cabinets are not usually made from metal and one reason why alloy stocks are thought less forgiving than deader wooden stocks.
Using a bench clamp fixes the stock rigidly to the massive bench. Induced vibrations in the stock will therefore be coupled to the bench, via whatever properties the stock-to-bench interface happens to have. Indeed, variations in barrel vibrations can be expected to depend on how tightly the clamp is done up. This is a very different situation from shooting from the shoulder, when the stock is coupled to the (well-damped) shoulder by another (very) compliant junction. Barrel vibrations in the clamp will be different from when at the shoulder. Some test benches allow the rifle to recoil much as it would at the shoulder. I cannot believe that rigid clamps allow meaningful testing, and therefore torque setting optimization using a rigid clamp will not optimise the system for anything other than shooting from a rigid clamp.
What do you think?
Barrel and stock act as separate masses, coupled together by a variable and 'lossy' spring (the bedding). How vibrations pass from one mass to the other depends on the nature of the intervening coupling. If vibrations pass into a well-damped medium, they will die out quickly. If the junction is such that vibrations pass poorly, energy will be reflected back, causing the barrel vibrations to persist, and perhaps excite resonances (the so-called harmonics). Wood is, to some extent, a lossy medium, which damps vibrations; most metals 'ring' if excited. This is why loudspeaker cabinets are not usually made from metal and one reason why alloy stocks are thought less forgiving than deader wooden stocks.
Using a bench clamp fixes the stock rigidly to the massive bench. Induced vibrations in the stock will therefore be coupled to the bench, via whatever properties the stock-to-bench interface happens to have. Indeed, variations in barrel vibrations can be expected to depend on how tightly the clamp is done up. This is a very different situation from shooting from the shoulder, when the stock is coupled to the (well-damped) shoulder by another (very) compliant junction. Barrel vibrations in the clamp will be different from when at the shoulder. Some test benches allow the rifle to recoil much as it would at the shoulder. I cannot believe that rigid clamps allow meaningful testing, and therefore torque setting optimization using a rigid clamp will not optimise the system for anything other than shooting from a rigid clamp.
What do you think?