basic ap ballistics questions

If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true

Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H

Forum rules
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
spacestout
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:19 pm

righto

Post by spacestout »

Thanks Fred. I have two goals; score well and win, and become a better overall shooter. I asked Scott his feelings re: the LP@ vs LP5. He said people will bring up trigger, but in the end they are both excellent guns and you will become familiar with the one you practice with and should score well with either. The Anschutz is lighter (which my sore elbow favors), well balanced (I haven't tried the weights yet which, being underneath, should steady like a keel but add weight) has a broader front sight, and a sweet trigger. I shoot the LP5 just as well. Today's proposed rapid fire course would require a gun such as an LP5 or LP50, and I love training with it for bullseye. Our Utah State bullseye and ISSF champion uses a CO2 LP5. Such a sweet dilema.
Post Reply