I've shot nothing but a 50ft gallery league (.22) since starting shooting again, not too long ago. In my mind, I always considered it kinda' like "junior" bullseye, as I was sort of a 2nd class citizen in the BE world. Recently, I swear I heard one of the more experienced fellows mention that it's "relatively" harder than the longer distances. Obviously meaning score-wise.
Our range is 25yd and hosts 900 events, from which there were recently a few leftover targets. For ha-ha's, I put one on and cranked it out to 25yds. Didn't bother to make any sight adjustments, and shot a few targets. I shot clearly better scores than I do at 50ft.
What do you guys think? Those of you that shoot both - how do your scores compare?
50 Foot "Gallery" Bullseye versus 25yd or standard
Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, Isabel1130
The outdoor targets are easier. The 50 foot are not proportionally smaller. Although the 50 foot do have an advantage when firing the .45, there is a mathematical disadvantage with the .22. Might be why there are two separate classifications for Indoor and Outdoor...
Take Care,
Ed Hall
Air Force Shooting Homepage
Bullseye (and International) Competition Things
Take Care,
Ed Hall
Air Force Shooting Homepage
Bullseye (and International) Competition Things
50 yards
I started out much like you - 50 feet only for a few years. I remember my 1st "long line" match. When I looked in the scope I was surprised at the "spread" of the shots. I reminded myself that the scoring rings were much larger. My score was better than my 50 foot score. That was it. I learned to love 50 yard bullseye. I always prefer to shoot outdoors over indoors.
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 10:56 am
- Location: Kansas