Hämmerli 106 vs. Toz 35

If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true

Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H

Forum rules
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
Post Reply
diopter
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 11:41 pm
Location: Montreal

Hämmerli 106 vs. Toz 35

Post by diopter »

If could buy one either of these used, in about the same condition, which would you chose, and why?
Cricman
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 8:46 pm
Location: Fort Worth, TX

Post by Cricman »

TOZ. Grips. Parts?

cricman
User avatar
6string
Posts: 445
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 11:53 pm

Post by 6string »

These two are very different, more so than meets the eye. First, the TOZ uses a striker in the falling block which is released by its own sear powered by an easily replaced coil spring. This makes for a very fast lock time.
The Hammerli uses an internal hammer,powered by an expensive/difficult to locate leaf spring, that swings up and hits a passive firing pin in the falling block.
The TOZ has a lower bore line, which gives a more straight back recoil. The Hammerli bore line is higher and closer to the sight line, thus canting is less of an issue. I have not found the recoil in the Hammerli problematic, even in the old model 100 with tapered octagonal barrel. I really like both!
However, I turned down a Hammerli because of parts and service expenses. When something goes wrong it will cost you a fortune. You can easily pay as much as the cost of the pistol to cover something like a faulty set trigger or damaged sear.
The TOZ parts are not a big problem.
Post Reply