Local rules?

If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true

Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H

Forum rules
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
User avatar
RobStubbs
Posts: 3183
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 1:06 pm
Location: Herts, England, UK

Post by RobStubbs »

PardiniGSP wrote:"...I whizz my target back and forth after every shot..."

What effect do you think all that whizzing has on the people shooting around you?
Er how about zero !

Most competitions with paper targets are one shot per card so cards go backwards and forwards all the time. If you shoot in a club with serious competition shooters then you better get used to it. Some of the old guys in my club didn't like it to begin with but I'm not compromising my shooting / training just to keep them less grumpy. Once I explained to them why I was doing it they were fine.

Rob.
User avatar
Nicole Hamilton
Posts: 477
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:17 pm
Location: Redmond, Washington, USA
Contact:

Post by Nicole Hamilton »

RobStubbs wrote:Most competitions with paper targets are one shot per card so cards go backwards and forwards all the time.
I think this is the difference between the US and Europe and the reason for the USAS rule allowing scopes. Airgun matches are nowhere near as popular as cartridge gun matches in the US, so there are lots of ranges that don't have carriers. For example, back when I still lived in Boston, I shot a few matches at a New Hampshire range that did not have carriers. What they had us do was put up a whole array of (was it 6?) targets at once, shoot them, then they'd make the line safe for everyone to go change the whole set. Pretty obviously, to make that workable, you do need a scope.
tleddy
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: South Florida

As regards "whizzing"...

Post by tleddy »

For those of you who do not live in North America, the term "whiz" is a rather funny idiomatic expression for relieving one's bladder. A country or peoples language frequently results in a vernacular vitually incomprehensible to others schooled in the formal language.

I think that George Bernard Shaw said "The United States and England are two countries separated by a common language."

I would find people whizzing all around me during an AP Match to be somewhat disconcerting...in any sense of the term.

Tillman
David Levene
Posts: 5617
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Ruislip, UK

Re: As regards "whizzing"...

Post by David Levene »

tleddy wrote:I think that George Bernard Shaw said "The United States and England are two countries separated by a common language."
As we've discovered many times on TT in the past.

Mind you, judging from the damp patch on his firing point, I've always thought that Rob just perspired a lot ;-) (only joking Rob).
User avatar
pgfaini
Posts: 328
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by pgfaini »

Nicole Hamilton wrote:
RobStubbs wrote:Most competitions with paper targets are one shot per card so cards go backwards and forwards all the time.
I think this is the difference between the US and Europe and the reason for the USAS rule allowing scopes. Airgun matches are nowhere near as popular as cartridge gun matches in the US, so there are lots of ranges that don't have carriers. For example, back when I still lived in Boston, I shot a few matches at a New Hampshire range that did not have carriers. What they had us do was put up a whole array of (was it 6?) targets at once, shoot them, then they'd make the line safe for everyone to go change the whole set. Pretty obviously, to make that workable, you do need a scope.
Down in Newberry, SC, Coach Joel "Doc." Sexton is using a new, still in development, AP target system, which uses targets printed on continuous rolls. A momentary/double-throw/center-off switch at each firing point, allows the shooter to roll the targets up or down, centering the next target in the unit's frame. These targets make a scope a necessity. Not only can you not WHIZZ the target back to the firing line, for a look see, but the target numbers we hand print on the upper right hand corner with a felt tip marker, are difficult to see at 10M., making the possibility of shooting on the wrong target a reality, if it weren't for the scope.

Paul
User avatar
eskinner
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Contact:

Re: USA Scope rules

Post by eskinner »

Nicole Hamilton wrote:
tleddy wrote:We're all adults but we all behave like children sometimes.
The rules should be posted before the match and, by entering you are agreeing to those rules.

But if this particular rule wasn't posted, or wasn't within the "reference rules" under which the event took place, then a change should require the concensus of those already signed up.

That's how rules *should* work.

But we're all human and some do quirky things sometimes.

If it's a small deal, then I'd say "bend with the wind." Cranking targets back and forth may be distracting but it also gives you the opportunity (!) of steeling yourself against distractions and deepening your concentration. In the long run, this can only help you.
Mike T.
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:58 am
Location: BC Interior, Canada

Whizzing

Post by Mike T. »

Well, here in Canada (again), we think we are doing really well to have returnable targets (clothesline) for Air Pistol and Rifle at our big matches (including the Canadian Airgun Grand Prix). Most have hand cranks, some have electric motors to do the winding. Yes, there are lots of targets whizzing back and forth all the time. One learns to concentrate and ignore the distraction.
Mike T.
iow
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:33 pm
Location: Deerfield Beach Florida

Post by iow »

Hey Nicole ..... Just turn up for your next league match and use your scope as usual ..... just wear cowboy boots and a thong bikini , then no-one will care about the scope !
User avatar
pgfaini
Posts: 328
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by pgfaini »

iow wrote:Hey Nicole ..... Just turn up for your next league match and use your scope as usual ..... just wear cowboy boots and a thong bikini , then no-one will care about the scope !
THAT WAS UNCALLED FOR!!!
Guest

Post by Guest »

has anybody wondered why the ISSF does not allow scopes for 10 Metre events?
User avatar
RobStubbs
Posts: 3183
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 1:06 pm
Location: Herts, England, UK

Post by RobStubbs »

Anonymous wrote:has anybody wondered why the ISSF does not allow scopes for 10 Metre events?
Not me. But if you try and fathom out the reasons behind all the ISSF rules you will probably go slowly mad.

Rob.
User avatar
pgfaini
Posts: 328
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by pgfaini »

RobStubbs wrote:
Anonymous wrote:has anybody wondered why the ISSF does not allow scopes for 10 Metre events?
Not me. But if you try and fathom out the reasons behind all the ISSF rules you will probably go slowly mad.

Rob.
Is it really true that they reduced the size of side blinders and occluders for "photogenic" reasons? This happened while I was away from the sport for a while, and when I came back, found I had to cut these down, and could no longer flip down the side blinders on my cap. Doesn't this reduce the safety value of these acessories?

Paul
User avatar
Fred Mannis
Posts: 1298
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Delaware

Post by Fred Mannis »

pgfaini wrote: Doesn't this reduce the safety value of these accessories?

Paul
Yes it does. Since USAS does not video matches, this is one place where it would make sense to have a local/regional exception to the Official ISSF Rules
User avatar
Richard H
Posts: 2654
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:55 am
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Contact:

Post by Richard H »

Anonymous wrote:has anybody wondered why the ISSF does not allow scopes for 10 Metre events?
Maybe because ISSF rule 6.3.15.3 says 10m ranges must be equiped with electric-mechanical target carriers or changers, oe electronic scoring targets.

Since they have that rule they really can't allow scopes as there should be no need for them.
tleddy
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: South Florida

6.3.15.3 10 m ranges must be equipped with electric-mechanic

Post by tleddy »

My thanks to Richard H for posting the reference rule.

Nicole - since the rangemaster has prohibited scope use, you might point out the requirement for the "electric-mechanical" target movers.

"6.3.15.3 - 10 m ranges must be equipped with electric-mechanical target
carriers or changers, or Electronic Scoring Targets."

Tillman
User avatar
pgfaini
Posts: 328
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: 6.3.15.3 10 m ranges must be equipped with electric-mech

Post by pgfaini »

tleddy wrote:
Nicole - since the rangemaster has prohibited scope use, you might point out the requirement for the "electric-mechanical" target movers.

"6.3.15.3 - 10 m ranges must be equipped with electric-mechanical target
carriers or changers, or Electronic Scoring Targets."

Tillman
Great post, Tillman

Paul
David Levene
Posts: 5617
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Ruislip, UK

Re: 6.3.15.3 10 m ranges must be equipped with electric-mech

Post by David Levene »

tleddy wrote:Nicole - since the rangemaster has prohibited scope use, you might point out the requirement for the "electric-mechanical" target movers.
We don't know whether the "clothesline style" target system was electric-mechanical or "human-powered", Nicole didn't specify.

What we do know is that, with a match of 30 shots and 2 shots per card, it could hardly have been described as a strict ISSF match. It is therefore back to a "local rules" match and depends on those rules being made clear.

At The British Pistol Club we obviously have severe problems fully complying with ISSF rules. We have found however that it is easier to base our own "local rules" on the ISSF book and simply issue a list of deviations from ISSF and update it when appropriate.
User avatar
Nicole Hamilton
Posts: 477
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:17 pm
Location: Redmond, Washington, USA
Contact:

Re: 6.3.15.3 10 m ranges must be equipped with electric-mech

Post by Nicole Hamilton »

David Levene wrote:We don't know whether the "clothesline style" target system was electric-mechanical or "human-powered", Nicole didn't specify.
:
At The British Pistol Club we obviously have severe problems fully complying with ISSF rules. We have found however that it is easier to base our own "local rules" on the ISSF book and simply issue a list of deviations from ISSF and update it when appropriate.
They're hand-cranked. There are no local rules written down anywhere for our league. The match director freely admitted he was making up the rule disallowing scopes on the spot.

I really appreciate Tillman's digging up that rule requiring electrically-operated carriers even though I don't think I want to confront our director with this information. I'm probably better off just enjoying the private satisfaction of knowing I'm right and he's a jerk. :)
User avatar
Richard H
Posts: 2654
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:55 am
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Contact:

Post by Richard H »

If you have returnable targets either human powered or electric-mechanical there is really no need for a scope. If they are making you post numerous targets at the same time (that are not returnable) then a scope should be allowed.
lurker

Post by lurker »

Nicole:

You chose to enter a league which does not have published rules nor any official sanctioning body other than the local rangemaster. While I might agree that the whizzing targets back and forth creates a distracting environment for all, a non-conforming competitor creates a distraction for all other competitors. I don't agree with your rangemaster though, and really disapprove of his attitude. With people like that nothing you do will ever satisfy them. If you quit and don't return, they don't even care and go on being a prick to someone else. The issue of local rules is pretty clear in this case. They are the only rules.
Post Reply