SRichieR wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2020 12:27 pm
And, it's difficult to x-ray and see it's internal contents.
No burning at the stake, but the above is not true.
The machines being used today can CLEARLY see if there is anything(other than a gas) in the cylinders. Photos of these scans have been shown to the highest authorities in the transportation department and there was a "so what" response.
Give the govt an inch and they'll literally take a mile. Logic and scientific reasoning have no effect.
SRichieR wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2020 12:27 pm
And, it's difficult to x-ray and see it's internal contents.
No burning at the stake, but the above is not true.
The machines being used today can CLEARLY see if there is anything(other than a gas) in the cylinders. Photos of these scans have been shown to the highest authorities in the transportation department and there was a "so what" response.
Give the govt an inch and they'll literally take a mile. Logic and scientific reasoning have no effect.
Maybe there lies the matter, A gas could be ANY gas, even one that could be used for a makeshift explosive device.
Maybe the X-rays can't tell the difference between inert nitrogen, common air and another harmful gas, and the manometer could have been manipulated to show zero pressure.
In spite it bothers me, I can understand that people who aren't specialized could be specially cautious on the matter.
