"load"

If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true

Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H

Forum rules
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
User avatar
rmca
Posts: 1195
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:55 pm
Location: Lisbon, Portugal

Re: "load"

Post by rmca »

David Levene wrote:
rmca wrote:Although the rules don't state clearly that you can't handle magazines, it is my interpretation that a magazine is a part of the gun, and therefore, if you're not allowed to handle the gun, you're not allowed to handle the magazine (with the exceptions mentioned for the finals).
Without checking, I can't think of anywhere in the rules where, if they are to be included, they don't say "guns and magazines".
I've given your argument some thought, and in my view, the reason the rules always mention "guns and magazines" is because this also applies to free pistol, rifle and shotgun. None of those have magazines (free pistol can, but it is not likely). All the rules we cited are in the "General Technical Rules", chapter 6.

I believe, that it is in the spirit of the rules, that if you aren't allowed to handle the gun, you shouldn't be allowed to handle the magazine. Similar to rule 6.7.2 regarding equipment.

Hope this helps
David Levene
Posts: 5617
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Ruislip, UK

Re: "load"

Post by David Levene »

rmca wrote: I believe, that it is in the spirit of the rules, that if you aren't allowed to handle the gun, you shouldn't be allowed to handle the magazine.
That, of course, is your interpretation. Others wouldn't agree.
User avatar
rmca
Posts: 1195
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:55 pm
Location: Lisbon, Portugal

Re: "load"

Post by rmca »

David Levene wrote:
rmca wrote: I believe, that it is in the spirit of the rules, that if you aren't allowed to handle the gun, you shouldn't be allowed to handle the magazine.
That, of course, is your interpretation. Others wouldn't agree.
Just for the sake of the argument, how would you defend the opposite view from mine?
David Levene
Posts: 5617
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Ruislip, UK

Re: "load"

Post by David Levene »

rmca wrote:
David Levene wrote:
rmca wrote: I believe, that it is in the spirit of the rules, that if you aren't allowed to handle the gun, you shouldn't be allowed to handle the magazine.
That, of course, is your interpretation. Others wouldn't agree.
Just for the sake of the argument, how would you defend the opposite view from mine?
There used to be a specific rule prohibiting you from touching magazines. That rule has been deleted.
Misny
Posts: 993
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 9:28 pm
Location: Indiana

Re: "load"

Post by Misny »

David Levene wrote:
conradin wrote: Not many people seems to be like you, a walking rules encyclopedia.
Not at all. Yes, I may know the rules better than many, but only because I look up anything I'm not sure of.
Yes, and maybe you don't shoot different disciplines where the rules conflict. IMHO, when one shoots different disciplines with different rules, it is pretty easy to get rules mixed up when relying on memory. In the USA we have, in addition to the international pistol disciplines, conventional pistol, action pistol, hunter's pistol, IHMSA, IDPA, IPSC, CAS and a few others which don't come to mind (there is that memory thing again).
Post Reply