rulings on eyeglasses?
Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H
Forum rules
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
rulings on eyeglasses?
anybody knows where can I find rulings regarding eyeglasses
is the +1.5 is the strongest what I can wear?
is the +1.5 is the strongest what I can wear?
-
- Posts: 5617
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: Ruislip, UK
There is no such ruling as David mentions. Your glasses can be whatever prescription you need, ISSF don't even mention lens strength.sanikok wrote:Thanks for the reply. I agree, should not be a problem - but I have to find the ruling (maybe on ISSF site) because I saw the +1.5 limitation somewhere a few years ago.
While I'm OK to drive with +1.5, I need +3 for reading or to see the sight clearly.
Rob.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:47 pm
-
- Posts: 5617
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: Ruislip, UK
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:47 pm
I don't get the jury intercession. Let's say you have a spotting scope strapped to your head, and you can count the fibers in the ten ring.Dr. Jim wrote:True, but if the lens combination produces a telescopic effect on the target, I would expect the jury to need to rule on the individual set-up.David Levene wrote:Not that I know of (in the ISSF rules).smoking357 wrote:Is there a rule against multiple-lens glasses in pistol shooting?
Dr Jim
Does a rule forbid this?
I don't get the jury intercession. Let's say you have a spotting scope strapped to your head, and you can count the fibers in the ten ring.
Does a rule forbid this?[/quote]
Actually that case would not apply, but up here in the frigid north we once had a range officer who ruled that a shooter's glasses were illegal because he had a flip out "loupe" to hold his +.5 lense. The RO contended that a two lens system constituted an optical telescope and was thus illegal. Jury resolved the dispute in favour of the shooter, eventually, as no magnification was evident.
I too cannot see that any optical system mounted on a pair of glasses would aid in the use of iron sights.
Dr Jim
Does a rule forbid this?[/quote]
Actually that case would not apply, but up here in the frigid north we once had a range officer who ruled that a shooter's glasses were illegal because he had a flip out "loupe" to hold his +.5 lense. The RO contended that a two lens system constituted an optical telescope and was thus illegal. Jury resolved the dispute in favour of the shooter, eventually, as no magnification was evident.
I too cannot see that any optical system mounted on a pair of glasses would aid in the use of iron sights.
Dr Jim
Now I've managed to sell my current home, which means we are waiting for our mandate is passed (passed from 07/09/10) should not be delayed. The only condition that I received from the WB was to get the value of land / new design house, valued, and then took five months to start collecting money on the basis of my existing mortgage had to be cleaned.
Buy RS GoldTera Online GoldWOW Gold
Buy RS GoldTera Online GoldWOW Gold