smallbore scope recommendations

Sawyer · Post by **Sawyer** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:57 am

Give me your recommendations for a smallbore prone scope. Anything goes. What have you used, what do you like, and why? Anyone using a Nikon Monarch for example?

Sawyer · Post by **Sawyer** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:15 pm

Oh, come on. I know there are readers of this board shooting American prone and smallbore position...

sandy22 · Post by **sandy22** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:40 pm

Sawyer wrote:(1)Give me your recommendations for a smallbore prone scope. Anything goes. (2)What have you used, (3)what do you like, and (4)why? (5)Anyone using a Nikon Monarch for example?

1. T-36

2. Leupold M8 20x, Redfield 6400, Lyman STS, Lyman AA 32x, Unertl 1 1/2

3&4. Leupold - best combination of quality & functionality & Unertl - looks the coolest & works o.k.

5. Not me

Pat McCoy · Post by **Pat McCoy** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:14 pm

I have used both Unertl and Lyman external adjustment scopes for smallbore, and they are great for prone. Weight became a problem in standing, so have switched to Burris 8x32AR. Lighter with good optics, and allows me to dial it up for prone.

I have a Nikon Monarch on a highpower rifle (250 Savage AI) and like the rings for shooting some light bench and 100 shoot offhand match. Good optics and seems to track fine. Kind of like shooting an aperture, but with better visability.

Freepistol · Post by **Freepistol** » Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:23 pm

sandy22 wrote:
Sawyer wrote:(1)Give me your recommendations for a smallbore prone scope. Anything goes. (2)What have you used, (3)what do you like, and (4)why? (5)Anyone using a Nikon Monarch for example?
1. T-36

2. Leupold M8 20x, Redfield 6400, Lyman STS, Lyman AA 32x, Unertl 1 1/2

3&4. Leupold - best combination of quality & functionality & Unertl - looks the coolest & works o.k.

5. Not me

2. Redfield 3200 {Still have it}
4. Redfield 6400 wasn't invented yet. There are many good light weight choices available today.

Sawyer · Post by **Sawyer** » Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:38 am

Thank you for the responses thus far. I borrowed a Leupold Vari-X and liked it. Also have a Redfield 3200 but it's longer and heavier than I like. Time for me to buy a smaller, lighter one but I want at least 24X and maybe more.

I may end up back at the Leupolds but I know there are other options out there, so I'm just curious about other shooters' personal experiences.

TerryKuz · Post by **TerryKuz** » Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:41 am

The 4200 series Bushnells are really good scopes. I think they are in the same class as Leupold. I can afford either, and I prefer the Bushnell for some applications. Certainly is a lot of bang for the buck.

Finprof · Post by **Finprof** » Thu Apr 01, 2010 8:55 am

Leupold used to make a BR and BR-D model in 24x and 36x. They are designed from benchrest shooting, but for prone indoor I can't think of anything better. They are still the preferred scope for silhouette shooters.
For a variable the Leupold 6.5-20 EFR is the standard. If you are using less than 20X that would be the recommendation.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:40 pm

Check out Vortex Optics. They are a new kid on the block, but the few owners I'v talked to seemed pleased.

http://www.vortexoptics.com/

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Apr 01, 2010 4:20 pm

TerryKuz, have you tried their illuminated mil-dot reticle?

TerryKuz · Post by **TerryKuz** » Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:25 pm

Anonymous wrote:TerryKuz, have you tried their illuminated mil-dot reticle?

No, I do not have experience with them. I did have a 6500 with the non illuminated mildot, and it was really nice. In a nice way, I am a snob on good glass, and Bushnell (Baush and Lomb) makes some good stuff. I also enjoy Leupold, Swarovski, and Leica. I am proud to admit I enjoy good optics, and a crisp trigger. Nice vice to have.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Apr 01, 2010 6:19 pm

I get that completely. I may try Mueller, a new outfit from Michigan. Great specs and reviews in a 8-25 x50 at a lower cost, with an illuminated dot, which I like.
What I really want is about a 14-32x with that reticle, at less than $700, but that does not exist.

Telecomtodd · Post by **Telecomtodd** » Thu Apr 01, 2010 6:52 pm

Here's a crazy idea for you. It worked for me.

A very experienced (and wealthy) smallbore shooter suggested I look into a 36X fixed power BSA scope. They are not manufactured consistently, but obtainable on Ebay and a couple of other outlets. THey can be bought for the pricely sum of $75. I bought two - one for 50 yards, one for 100 yards, and mounted each one on a 6811 mounting plate. They are also 1/8 MOA with target knobs. I have used scopes that allowed a little more light in, and my last scope was a Nikon Monarch - but these two scopes have been wonderful. No more clicking between 50 and 100 when you can afford to have two scopes! The 36X is a bit high in power, but it works for me.

Now if I could afford a second metallic rear sight!

Sawyer · Post by **Sawyer** » Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:51 pm

Todd, I like that idea! Though I did use a BSA once and it sucked royally-- the zero wandered something fierce. But one for each distance, if you can get two of some scope for cheap, that's a good idea.

plinker · Post by **plinker** » Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:02 pm

If I could afford it, I'd buy one of the old Unertl target scopes. I've looked on Gunbroker and every once in a while a nice one pops up - but never when I'm flush with cash - just my luck!

There's another guy on the internet who sells Unertls and his prices are fair (but not cheap either!). Sorry but I can't remember his name. If you search for Unertl scopes, his name will come up.

(Or you could wait until the new Redfields come out and give them a try!)

Sawyer · Post by **Sawyer** » Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:38 pm

I'd go for Unertl but I don't like all that extra weight out there for shooting position, or even prone when it's really windy. I prefer less of a sail in the wind, so a newer design, compact scope is what I'm looking for.

jhawk · Post by **jhawk** » Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:04 pm

I like the Weaver T24. The microtrac adjustments are very accurate, and repeatable, and the scope is not too heavy. I have an older T-16 that is also a good choice. They are not as clear as the Leupold scopes but almost, and not quite as expensive.

Jake · Post by **Jake** » Sun Mar 06, 2011 7:41 pm

I have a Lyman STS 20x that I used to win the Utah state gallery championship in 62 on a very reliable Rem Mod, 37. It was also mounted on a Martini single shot Imp. 219 zipper, which took out numerous woodchucks at 300 yds plus, this with an Ackley barrel.
The scope has a 1/8 min. dot with very fine crosshairs. I've always sworn buy it and never had to swear at it.

It still looks like new and I have the wood box it came in. I might part with it, but would have to disciuss it with my son. D.F. Jacobsen
jacode@q.com

Boblor · Post by **Boblor** » Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:53 am

If anything goes, how about one of the March scopes. Lots of dollars but they do have excellent optics. And they are relatively light.

I have used unertl, Lyman scopes for prone and Nightforce.

bob L.

MNshooter · Post by **MNshooter** » Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:42 pm

Hi:

You might want to try a a Super Sniper from swfa.com. They come in 10X, 16X & 20X for $299.95. They are good inexpensive target scopes with good wind-age and elevation knobs. If you put 1/4 min on or take it off that's what you get. I have on one my high power prone rifle and I have had no trouble since I bought it.

TargetTalk

smallbore scope recommendations

smallbore scope recommendations

Re: smallbore scope recommendations

Re: smallbore scope recommendations

scopes

Re: scopes

scopes

Smallbore prone scope

smallbore prone scope anything goes